Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

The Saudi Initiative - A Genuine Opportunity

Filed under: Egypt ~ International Institutions ~ Middle East ~ Palestine

The famous Israeli diplomat Abba Eban once quipped that "the Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity [for peace]." With Israel's refusal to-date to accept the recently re-tabled Saudi Peace initiative offering Israel peace with the entire Arab World, it seems that it may be Israel this time that is guilty of Abba's charge. For years there has been no substantive progress concerning the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The Israeli position has been that there is no "viable" partner from the Palestinian side to negotiate with. It seems as though the tide has changed in dramatic fashion over the course of the past few months.

Much of this is due to the assertion of the Saudis as the regional diplomatic powerhouse. In February, Saudi King Abdullah helped facilitate the Mecca agreement between Fatah and Hamas that put an end to the internecine factional violence between the two parties. The Arab League summit, hosted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, reinvigorated the previously inert Saudi Initiative.

This is a window of opportunity that Israel must seize; all 22 Arab countries are willing to normalize relations with Israel in exchange for an Israeli withdrawal from the Arab territories it occupied since 1967.

So what is the problem? Israel is not willing to negotiate with the new Palestinian Unity Government that includes Hamas because it has yet to meet the Quartet’s (composed of the E.U, U.N., U.S., and Russia) conditions (recognize Israel, renounce violence, respect all previous agreements). Furthermore, despite some positive pronouncements, Israel refuses to accept the Saudi Initiative because of clauses regarding the Palestinian refuges and borders.

This refusal is unwarranted because while the Initiative does call for a sovereign, independent Palestinian state with its capital in Arab East Jerusalem, it does so on the basis of the internationally recognized 1967 borders. In terms of the Palestinian refugees, it calls for a "just" and "agreed upon" solution to the refugee problem. Equally critical, the Arab League Initiative has stated that as long as Israel accepts the Initiative "In Principle", then everything is open for negotiations

Israel's refusal to negotiate is contradictory to American economic interests and Israeli security interests. By achieving regional peace, Israel can finally be fully integrated into the Middle East. The Palestinians will have their state and the Israelis the security they have been unable to achieve since Israel's establishment. One need only look at the Recent G.C.C. (the Gulf Cooperative Council) involvement in major economic outreach programs with Asian countries, such as India and China, to realize the economic potential of peace. Billions of dollars are flowing back and forth between the oil rich Gulf States and Asia.

Instead of exploiting the new opportunity for peace presented by the Saudi Initiative, for peace in the region and a new epoch of economic prosperity for all parties involved, Israel is sitting on its diplomatic hands waiting for the ever important "pre-conditions" to be met. The onus is often put on increasing weakness of the Olmert administration and its lack of political capital. Yet, a majority of Israel citizens desire a two-state solution. There is no other act that an Israeli Prime Minister could perform to galvanize more internal support.

For the U.S., a serious and meaningful role as an honest mediator in the peace process could repair its dwindled and demonized image in the Middle East and Muslim world, with all the attendant benefits of Arab cooperation on Iraq. King Abdullah is not calling for the Israelis to simply sign the Saudi Initiative. Negotiations are expected over the Palestinian refugees, East Jerusalem and final borders before a final agreement is reached.

Israel's continuous claim that it wants peace stands tested by whether it accepts the Saudi Initiative in principle as the framework for a regional peace agreement. The U.S. stands at a fork in the Mid-East and the path it chooses will have serious ramifications on its national security and future economic opportunities in the region. Using our influence with our number one ally in the Middle East to reconsider the Saudi Initiative is our best hope today for securing both our interests and peace.

Originally on PBH.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Mark Krauss says:

Just where have you been lately? Fatah and Hamas are in an all out civil war so large even the mainstream media have been reporting it, just who the hell is Israel supposed to negotiate with?


Sandy says:

A good blog reveals their soft underbelly in an error filled post about why Israel is bad.

This quote says it all "In February, Saudi King Abdullah helped facilitate the Mecca agreement between Fatah and Hamas that put an end to the internecine factional violence between the two parties"

If that's and end to violence then no wonder they have problems.


Sandy says:

This article was written by Adam from TOFYH. His post of 5/12/07 starts off with:

Its not often that you are going to find me writing something that is critical of the Palestinians. I understand that there are a number of fronts on which they can be criticized, mainly due to acts of terrorism performed by Hamas, Islamic Jihad or some radical Salafi group. But, I am deeply frustrated with the lack of progress on the Saudi Inititative.

Wow! Israel is really really bad!


Jeha says:

The region's problems are interconnected, and cannot be solved by a single initiative.

King Abduallah's initiative is a good opportunity, but the current Israeli government barely has the mandate to survive past the summer, let alone negotiate with anyone.


Jeha says:

The region's problems are interconnected, and cannot be solved by a single initiative.

King Abdullah's initiative is a good opportunity, but the current Israeli government barely has the mandate to survive past the summer, let alone negotiate with anyone.


Cynic says:

... it does so on the basis of the internationally recognized 1967 borders.

Those 1967 borders are the 1949 "Armistice Lines"!


Jason says:

So, Israel is supposed to make peace with a non-state that in free-and-fair democratic elections, elected a party that can't even pretend to accept a two-state solution.

The mask has slipped. For as long as I can remember, the PLO->Fatah has made nice in English while publishing the Jews-are-pigs textbooks so favored by the Saudis. Hamas can't even be bothered to say the right things in English.

The Israelis are right and the palestinians are figuring out that democracy makes you more responsible for your situation than you'd be if you were being jerked around by a dictator. All those palestinians that voted for Hamas are getting exactly what they voted for.

Democracy works.


Robert S. Barnes says:

The Saudi Plan is not a peace plan, it is a plan for Israeli's destruction. It effectively calls for flooding pre-67 Israel with millions of Arabs, so called "Palestinian" Arabs. It is nothing more than a piece of propaganda put out by the Arabs as part of their media war against Israel, which is just an extension of their attempts to destroy my country.


Robert S. Barnes says:

The Saudi Plan is not a peace plan, it is a plan for Israel's destruction. It effectively calls for flooding pre-67 Israel with millions of Arabs, so called "Palestinian" Arabs. It is nothing more than a piece of propaganda put out by the Arabs as part of their media war against Israel, which is just an extension of their attempts to destroy my country.


Robert S. Barnes says:

The Saudi Plan is not a peace plan, it is a plan for Israel's destruction. It effectively calls for flooding pre-67 Israel with millions of Arabs, so called "Palestinian" Arabs. It is nothing more than a piece of propaganda put out by the Arabs as part of their media war against Israel, which is just an extension of their attempts to destroy my country.


David M says:

Trackbacked by The Thunder Run - Web Reconnaissance for 05/18/2007
A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention.


Mark Krauss says:

It's amazing, the number of people who will not bother to lift up a Quran and read it, or even listen to the terrorists when they plainly state their intentions to utterly destroy Israel, and western civilization. just pat the cute little terrorists on the head in the most condescending way imaginable, thinking of them as little mis-behaving children. caring not one whit about the wanton slaughter committed in the name of Islam for centuries. of course, my "unbalanced, unrefined view" of the situation will cause the leftist terrorist lovers to ignore this comment, after all, to them there is no wrong or right, just "differing but equally valid worldviews". meting out death and destruction is a valid "lifestyle choice" that the UN ought to protect, right?


Mark Krauss says:

It's amazing, the number of people who will not bother to lift up a Quran and read it, or even listen to the terrorists when they plainly state their intentions to utterly destroy Israel, and western civilization. just pat the cute little terrorists on the head in the most condescending way imaginable, thinking of them as little mis-behaving children. caring not one whit about the wanton slaughter committed in the name of Islam for centuries. of course, my "unbalanced, unrefined view" of the situation will cause the leftist terrorist lovers to ignore this comment, after all, to them there is no wrong or right, just "differing but equally valid worldviews". meting out death and destruction is a valid "lifestyle choice" that the UN ought to protect, right?


Mark Krauss says:

It's amazing, the number of people who will not bother to lift up a Quran and read it, or even listen to the terrorists when they plainly state their intentions to utterly destroy Israel, and western civilization. just pat the cute little terrorists on the head in the most condescending way imaginable, thinking of them as little mis-behaving children. caring not one whit about the wanton slaughter committed in the name of Islam for centuries. of course, my "unbalanced, unrefined view" of the situation will cause the leftist terrorist lovers to ignore this comment, after all, to them there is no wrong or right, just "differing but equally valid worldviews". meting out death and destruction is a valid "lifestyle choice" that the UN ought to protect, right?


Mark Krauss says:

It's amazing, the number of people who will not bother to lift up a Quran and read it, or even listen to the terrorists when they plainly state their intentions to utterly destroy Israel, and western civilization. just pat the cute little terrorists on the head in the most condescending way imaginable, thinking of them as little mis-behaving children. caring not one whit about the wanton slaughter committed in the name of Islam for centuries. of course, my "unbalanced, unrefined view" of the situation will cause the leftist terrorist lovers to ignore this comment, after all, to them there is no wrong or right, just "differing but equally valid worldviews". meting out death and destruction is a valid "lifestyle choice" that the UN ought to protect, right?


Mark Krauss says:

sorry about the copies, this comment site reports an error every time I try to post, didn't know it was actually posting.


solomonpal says:

Eeegadds...How did this one slip by? The rest above said it all...Do I need to remove you from my favorites?Tell me this is just a test


solomonpal says:

Eeegadds...How did this one slip by? The rest above said it all...Do I need to remove you from my favorites?Tell me this is just a test


Robert Mayer says:

solomonpal -- No need to do that. Alec, in his own words, is our resident lefty that we actually get along with. He shares very much the same ideals about democracy as we do. However, even I have to submit myself to modesty, as I cannot claim to know that any one course of action or ideology is the absolute path to reaching this goal. Therefore I appreciate his perspective, though that doesn't mean I agree with this post necessarily. You will even see multiple posts on the same subject by different contributors so that you can see the varying opinions, such as a similar one to this by Manuela that is against the initiative.

I personally do not trust the Arab governments due to their fundamental regime nature. As well, the legitimacy of the current Israeli government is in public doubt, while that of the Palestinian government is nonexistent.


alec says:

The timing is a little bit weird, this was actually written approximately a month ago. It's difficult to imagine a viable partner on the Palestinian side until the current situation in Gaza is worked out.


alec says:

Jeha: I personally agree. It's going to be a long process towards an Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation and a similar process for the Arab nations and Israel.

Robert Barnes: Nothing in the peace initiative states that Israel will have to take in all the refugees again. In fact, it asks for a just compromise on the issue. I think most of us can agree that Palestinians that were kicked off of their property in 1948 should be given a certain amount of restitution.

Mark: I don't think any of my post says that we should give in to terrorists. Unless you are assuming every Muslim is a terrorist or that that Koran orders a similar nature towards Israel, I think you're missing the point. We should realize that the moderates in the region are in a terrible position, and that the consistent problems with Israel Palestine really debilitates the legitimacy of American backed governments (primarily because America is not only the biggest backer of Israel, but of Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia -- regimes that are just that, regimes, but diplomatically helpful especially considering the rise of Iran).


Mark Krauss says:

It's not about me, Mohammad made himself clear, read his book, yeah some Muslims don't follow his mandate, that does not mean Mohammad's mandate does not exist, many do support it, Saudi Arabia is the largest exporter of whahabism in the world, yet you call them moderate, just try to go visit mecca and see how moderate they are. that's kind of like a yuppie bank executive driving a BMW wearing a Che Guevara t-shirt, it don't make no sense to me.

Blame Israel for all the Muslim violence that has been constant for 1200 years if it makes you feel better, they're used to it.


Mark Krauss says:

While you are at it, why don't you evangelize all the women in your family to Islam, I'm sure they would think that "peaceful religion" would be to their liking, take them to moderate saudi arabia, and moderate Iran, and moderate pakistan, get them circumsized, beat them for indescresions like showing too much ankle in public, kill them for getting themselves raped, etc. that would be fun eh?

http://drsanity.blogspot.com/2007/05/sticking-to-what-i-know-best.html

if you refuse to read the Quran, maybe you have time to read this.


Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/190