Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Comes a Humanitarian

Filed under: Russia

PH2007061200876.jpg

If somebody had told you twenty years ago that within five years the mighty USSR would collapse like a house of cards and the cold war would end, you probably would have laughed at them.

Suppose they'd then told you that less than a decade after the collapse, the people of Russia would freely elect a proud KGB spy as their second-ever president, and sit idly by whilst he (1) assumed control over the national media, (2) abolished local elections and elections to the upper house of parliament, (3) jailed his leading rival (in Siberia, no less) and quite possibly (4) blew up a couple of apartment buildings full of innocent people to justify war in Chechnya and ordered contract hits on a series of public critics of his regime. Probably, you would have called for the men in white coats, wouldn't you?

And what if they then told you that right after all that happened Russia's most famous living dissident, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who spent time in the GULAG and was then exiled for daring to criticize the murderous regime of Josef Stalin (who killed at least as many Russians as Hitler), would happily accept a prize for "humanitarian activity" from that very KGB spy, having earlier invited him over for a spot of tea and posing for photo op (as shown above) and not saying a single word about the creeping return of a Stalinesque regime, but only: "Our bitter national experience can yet help us in a possible repeat of unstable social conditions. It will forewarn and protect us from destructive breakdowns." In other words: Don't worry, be happy! That "humanitarian activity" for which he was rewarded by the KGB spy? In the words of the Washington Post, it was having "praised Putin for working to restore a strong state and echoed the president's accusations of Western encroachment."

kwai3.jpg

What would you have said then? Maybe you'd have thought about that movie "Bridge on the River Kwai" and the scene at the end when the British officer, played by Alec Guinness, suddenly realizes he's spent the whole movie helping the Japanese to win World War II. Maybe you'd think, gee, I bet that sometime right before he kicks the neo-Soviet bucket Solzhenitsyn is going to have a look on his face just like that British officer had just before he got shot and fell on the dynamite plunger by accident.

Well, he will if there's any justice in the world, anyway.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


jdavenport says:

I unfortunately find some truth in the argument of encroaching western influence.

I don't trust Putin in the least, nor the Russian apparatus. However, Russias natural resources are so vast that there was an immediate influx of serious foreign big business power. And the State was not ready to deal with it. It couldn't deal with it's own oliogarchs.

US foreign policy should have worked overtime to ensure the rise of a functioning rule of law and reasonable market and press mechanisms. Instead, we let our boys go for the jugular. (Not that their own people weren't doing the same.)

So we ended up with a bunch of really POd, extrordinarily bright, and exceptionally nasty ex-KGB agents running around trying to cash in. We should have helped them cash in, because now they want revenge.


Manuela says:

Kim -- how man layers of power are there (generally speaking) in Russia? We have the KGB now under a different name, oligarchs that come from KGB ranks, russian mafia -- do they cooperate or are merely tolerated by KGB? We all know what happens with the pro-freedom and human right activists, and the masses.

jdavenport pointed out something very important -- but I would not call it revenge -- I doubt Russians call it that way -- it is more the quest to regain supremacy at a global level and being acknowledged as such.

It is national pride, dignity etc in the same package. In a way similar to what Muslims hope to regain.


La Russophobe says:

MANUELA:

You're certainly asking the right question, and the first part of the answer is the worst part, namely that Russia's government structure is essentially secret, perhaps even more so than in Soviet times, and therefore we simply don't know.

The next part is to recognize that the KGB and the Kremlin are becoming horrifyingly synonymous. A huge share of those in the positions of power in the Kremlin have backgrounds in the KGB, and this gets larger and larger every day. It's as if what we feared from the old Andropov regime has actually come to pass.

Finally, the best discussion of the clear overlap between mafia and KGB is to be found here

http://lrtranslations.blogspot.com/2007/02/spare-organs.html

from the valiant pages of Novaya Gazeta.


La Russophobe says:

JDAVENPORT:

You're certainly correct that we (read: Clinton Administration) badly bungled the transition from USSR to Russia. However, I'm inclined to think that we were not aggressive enough, rather than too aggressive, and showed far too much respect for and faith in the Russian people, who are conspicuous by their absence from your analysis. There's simply no excuse for what they've done in electing and supporting Putin, it's sheer blasphemy no matter what mistakes we've made, and our failure to be more aggressive in the transition (as we failed to take the initiative during the Bolshevik transition) has led many to conclude they can get away with anything. After all, Ronald Reagan "encroached" on the USSR something fierce, and whipped it.


David M says:

Trackbacked by The Thunder Run - Web Reconnaissance for 06/13/2007
A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention.


Rudy Carrera says:

The analysis all of you bring to this topic is excellent (I've become accustomed to good writing coming from this blog for some years now), but it does break my heart to see a man who I once gladly called a hero in Solzhenitsyn trying to defend the product of a system that nearly broke him.



Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/227