Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Iron Curtain, Part II

Filed under: Russia

I have a strong admiration and regard for the valiant Russian people and for my wartime comrade, Marshal Stalin. There is deep sympathy and goodwill in Britain -- and I doubt not here also -- toward the peoples of all the Russias and a resolve to persevere through many differences and rebuffs in establishing lasting friendships. It is my duty, however, to place before you certain facts about the present position in Europe. From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic an iron curtain has descended across the Continent. Behind that line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw, Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest and Sofia; all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call the Soviet sphere, and all are subject, in one form or another, not only to Soviet influence but to a very high and in some cases increasing measure of control from Moscow. The safety of the world, ladies and gentlemen, requires a unity in Europe, from which no nation should be permanently outcast. It is from the quarrels of the strong parent races in Europe that the world wars we have witnessed, or which occurred in former times, have sprung.
--Winston Churchill, Fulton Missouri, March 5, 1946

Just as it was the British who warned us half a century ago of the dangers brewing in the USSR, the valiant Britons once again step to the forefront to warn us in the strongest, clearest terms about the threat we now face from neo-Soviet Russia. Faced with Russian refusal to extradite accused Litvinenko killer Andrei Lugovoi (as we've already shown, the Kremlin's constitution-based excuses are a pure sham), Britain has done the only thing it could do, respond with an appropriate show of force, and expelled four Russian diplomats from London.

Do you dare to imagine the reaction of the Russians, dear reader, if a publicly anti-American U.S. defector, living in Russia, were suddenly killed by radioactive poisoning in Moscow, with contamination spread around the city endangering thousands, and the Kremlin announced it knew who the killer was, and he was in Washington DC, and America refused to extradite him for trial in Russia? Can you imagine how the headlines of Russia's state-owned newspapers would scream?

It is time for the world to hear Britain's valiant warning and act on it, to rally to Britain's cause and demand that Russia give the Litvinenko killing justice rather than obstruction. It is time for the people of Russia to feel the consequences of endorsing KGB rule of their country, time to stand up for the values of democracy that have given us such a high standard of living, so far above the squalor that is modern Russia (with its sub-60 male lifespan and $3/hour average wage). America in particular must stand resolutely beside her British allies, just as Tony Blair stood beside George Bush before the US Congress in the aftermath of 9/11.

For once again, an Iron Curtain has descended across the continent.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Colleen says:

I have a quote too: "I'm not going to start the Third World War for you." This was said by British General Sir Mike Jackson to American General Wesley Clark over Clark's attempts to confront the Russians after the seizure of the Pristina airport.

And we can even go back to Churchill. The Fulton speech was given when the U.S. had a nuclear monopoly and still drunk over their "primacy in power," as Churchill put it in that speech. This all ended in 1949 (or 1948 lol), when the Soviets got the bomb. And, we can see a personality change in Churchill post-Soviets getting the bomb. "A meeting at the summit," etc.

So I guess it all comes down to two questions:

1) Are you drunk on power?
2) What power?

These are rhetorical, so please don't answer.

Pointing and laughing,

Colleen


Aris Katsaris says:

Colleen, Russia has been trying to bandage its self-inflicted wounds with vile aggression and territorial grabs on its neighbors and with the murders of its own dissidents, at home and abroad.

Russia so far has partitioned Georgia and Moldova, it has cyber-attacked Estonia, it has opposed democracy in Ukraine, it demands a say on the defense systems of Czech and Poland, it has murdered British citizens on British soil.

Russia, for all intends and purposes has already declared war against a large portion of the world.

What the rest of the world needs to do is merely acknowledge the reality. If a 3rd world war begins, it will be because of Russia's wishes, not the West's (which on the whole has been shamefully accommodating towards Russia, so far).


Colleen says:

Aris,

Nothing that Russia has done can be compared to the illegal war for oil that the U.S. and Britain have waged at the expense of a million or so innocent civilians.

The U.S. has started the trend of breaking up treaties, norms, and codes and asking Russia to ignore its security for the sake of cooperation is hypocritical.

You want to talk about partition? How about the former Yugoslavia and future former Iraq? Military bases in Romania and Bulgaria and scattered across Central Asia. And now trying to convince ally Japan of revising its pacifist Constitution.

America is the agressor and everyone knows this!

That is why the U.S.'s support is steeply declining the world over, especially the indefendable 3rd world, and Russia is seen, to many, as our only hope.

Colleen


La Russophobe says:

COLEEN:

"America is the agressor and everyone knows this!"

How long did it take you to talk to all the billions of people in the world? As long as a week? Ten days? Or do you believe you have ESP and can just "sense" what everyone thinks. Did America kill Litvinenko too? Do you just KNOW it? If so, then please clue me in on tomorrow's LOTTO, won't you?

Pointing and laughing.

Meanwhile, if you're right, very odd that so many should still be flocking to America's shores whilst nobody is heading for Russia.

And, in case you hadn't noticed dear, this post is about BRITAIN, not America. The USA didn't expel any Russian diplomats. More's the pity.


Aris Katsaris says:

Nothing that Russia has done can be compared to the illegal war for oil that the U.S. and Britain have waged at the expense of a million or so innocent civilians.

Nice attempt to avoid the subject. Let's leave aside for a min the fact that most of the deaths in Iraq happen by Iraqis on Iraqis -- not by Americans. I'm no fan of Bush's torturers and murderers as I've proven time and again, in this site also.

But the point is -- what does this have *anything* to do with Russia's own crimes?

What did Georgia do, that you had to partition it and pogrom its nationals? What did Moldova do to you that you had to divide her in half? Why did you support the poisoning non-democrats in Ukraine? Why did you attempt to bully Estonia? Why did you murder Anna Politkovskaya?

The answer isn't "America's war on Iraq". The answer is Russia's own villainy that you are trying to distract us from by naming a few of America's own crimes.

Kinda like Hitler might name the British Empire's occupation of India as his justification for invading Poland. Total non-sequitur but there you have it. You can't defend your own actions on your own right, and therefore you merely find the convenient petty villainies of Bush to bash instead.

How about the former Yugoslavia and future former Iraq?

LOL! Russia *supported* the genocidal murderous partitioners of Bosnia.

Military bases in Romania and Bulgaria

Romania and Bulgaria are democracies that freely elected to be members of NATO, no matter how much the word "democracy" and "freedom" (let alone "national independence") causes Russia an allergy.

But Georgia doesn't want your troops in its soil -- and yet you still have them there! Kinda of a marked difference.

I'm not an American and when I bash Russia's imperialistic ambitions, I bash them for their own sake, not in contrast to some American perfection. America acted as a villain in Iraq. Russia is acting like a villain against a dozen nations -- and against its *own* people (like Politkovskaya) also.

America is the vile and arrogant British Empire. Russia is the even viler and (eviller) rising Nazi Germany.


armchair pessimist says:

If you go by the comments section in some of the Brit newspapers, most of the readers are on Russia's side in this latest diplomatic row. Putin said the UK is a haven for terrorists and criminals, and a lot of Brits completely agree.

Probably rage and frustration with their own government and its multiculturalist delusions are at work here, rather than any sympathy with the Bear, but there it is.

The phrase "Finlandised Europe" has been cropping up recently here and there, which I take to mean that pretty soon the former East Block nations are going to be sold down the river. Again.






Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/283