Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Annals of Cold War II

Filed under: Russia

For those who had any doubt as to whether we are fully confronted with a second cold war with the Rooskies, four developments last week lay such doubts conclusively to rest.

First, Russia began delivering sophisticated missile defense systems to Syria, systems that can easily be passed on to an even worse sponsor of terror, Iran. What protection do we have from that? Russia made Syria promise not to send the weapons on to Iran, and it assures us Syria would never break its word. Recently, the U.S. announced its intention to label Iran's "Revolutionary Guards" unit a terrorist group, and the group responded: "America will receive a heavier punch from the guards in the future. We will never remain silent in the face of U.S. pressure and we will use our leverage against them." We've just reported on this group's offensive missile capability, and now Russia is potentially providing a way for them to defend it.

Second, after menacing the U.S. base at Guam with bombers, Russia announced an official reinvigoration of its long-range bomber program and sent out a host of bombers on various missions to emphasize its hostile intentions. In typical neo-Soviet fashion, many of these bombers were somewhat comical relics of the past driven by propellers, but others were more modern jets.

Third, Russia was caught red-handed having repeatedly violated Georgian airspace and jettisoning a missile on Georgian territory, then spewing forth a shoddy torrent of lies to cover its tracks. Russia is seeking to destabilize two different regions of Georgia so as to prevent the country from qualifying for NATO membership and assuring it will remain an easy target for neo-Soviet imperialism.

Finally, in an act that bespeaks truly craven neo-Soviet cowardice, Russia silenced the broadcasts of the BBC, showing that just as in Soviet times it can't handle mere verbal criticism.

How much more evidence does the world need before it responds appropriately to the neo-Soviet threat?

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


marketwhisper says:

Sadly there is an anti cold war incumbancy (majority) that inhabits our intel agencies, as discussions by former officials makes clear. It was interesting to read recently about the Kremlin unknowns and dearth of sources we maintain inside Russia - not that we had many successes during the cold war (CNN maybe). There has been an ineetia inside State to dismiss the Bear and embrace the Chinese as if both are benevolvent forces for good. Our fiscal and strategic situation dictate that we haven;t many options at the moment. One has to acknowledge we have a problem to address the problem. The United States is borrowing time, fiscally and strategically. If the cold war teaches anything it is that the Russian Arms megaplex is capable of turning out advanced weaponry. Couple that with an aggressive China - note Gertz article regarding Chinease demands to split the Pacific into eastern and westrern spheres of influence - and partitioning Latin Americaa and you have an opaque flanking manuever. State's role has always been quiotic and oxymoronic. It is becoming dangerious.

Lets recount the weeks events: Russia resumes strategic bomber flights, Russia claims the artic region, China and Russia host major joint exercise, China courts Eurasian Capitals and China threatens to tank the dollar. I argue the term smart bomb is being redefined in the confucian sense. The United States is utterly rudderless and blame lies with the incompetence of Bush first and foremost along with the seriously embarrassing Sec. of State Rice and her minions. We need to seriously rethink our foreign policy and that conversation ought to begin not with the "MOAB" or "MIRV" rather our economic policy. Game on folks. We need a new coach, new strategy and new tools.


Manuela Paraipan says:

Russia'a friendly relations with Syria and Iran (Tehran's proxies too) are not good omen. Plus Russia's military exercises with SCO countries&observers rings the alarm.I just love how EU looks and does nada!

This piece of Rubin's is worth reading.

http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2006/issue2/jv10no2a1.html


haley says:

Hypocrite, defending the U.S.'s plans to put-up a missile defence shield in Poland/Czech Republic, you kept on repeating that Russia shouldn't complain because these are "defencive" and therefore, by definition, not a threat to Russia.


haley says:

Another message to the Hypocrite:

It's ok for the U.S. to have bomber sorties, but not ok for Russia?

and why did Georgia destroy 60% of the "missile" and fill-up the "crater" before Russian investigators were allowed to investigate?

You are such a brainwashed Hypocrite!


La Russophobe says:

HALEY:

Your attempt to suggest that America provoking Russia is the same as Russia provoking America is absurd on its face.

Russia has half America's population, one-twelfth its economy and tiny fraction of its military power. It has a male adult lifespan below 60 and no allies. Russia can't afford to provoke America, pure and simple.

What's more, America isn't shutting down the BBC or supplying weapons to Chechen rebels. It's not killing off anti-American dissidents. Russia's recent actions against Georgia have no parallel in all of American history.

Your one-sided, propagandistic "analysis" belies your own agenda; it's simply weird that you would criticize anyone else for having one.


haley says:

Hypocrite:

Russia has 4 times as much oil and 10 times as much natural gas as the U.S. on almost twice as much land. While the U.S. is on the brink of economic catastrophe, Russia's GDP growth rate is double America's.

Russia has no friends? Wow, is that funny because it seems that you're still living in the Cold War and can't face the awkward truth that America is now the one with fewer and fewer friends. Soon, I will literally be able to count America's remaining allies with my 10 fingers; it's truly a rogue nation out-of-line with the rest of the world, being shunned for its militant behavior.

Russia is not the one country that's invading other countries illegitimately, outside of the United Nations and in violation of international law. Russia hasn't started these new rounds of aggressions, which might have begun when Bill Clinton broke George H.W. Bush's promise to Russia to not move NATO east "not one inch" or when the U.S. decided to break the ABM treaty.

You are completely brainwashed and totally hypocritical and, lately, it seems like you're becoming more and more desperate because things aren't going America's way, while Russia is strengthening and the rest of the world likes it.


Silly Joe Hackworth says:

Yeah, the US is a rogue nation. We should just sit back and let maniacs who follow a desert pedophile dictate how we should live. We're such rogues!

Maybe people would like us more if we ignored genocide, killed all opponents of the current regime, and became a one party state ruled by an oligarchical mafia.


Uazik says:

One of these things is not like the other...

http://www.elbitsystems.com/data/SU-25%5Bnew%5D.pdf

http://www.civil.ge/IMG2006/IGEReportMissileIncident.pdf

X-58U = Kh-58U = AS-11


La Russophobe says:

HALEY:

You're a liar. American and Russian oil production is roughly equal, it's just that the US uses all its oil for domestic consumption to develop economic might while Russia's puny economy leaves it plenty to sell, without which the Kremlin would be bankrupt, meaning Russia can't afford to develop. Moreover, the Canadian oil shale fields will provide the US with plenty of oil in the long term, and Saudi Arabia, a close US ally, has far more oil than Russia.

Can't you even try to tell the truth a little?

The US economy is booming. 1% growth on an economy of 12 trillion produces far more value to the country than 5% on Russia's puny sub-$1 trillion economy. People are lined up for miles seeking entry to the USA, but nobody from civilized countries wants to go to Russia.

Your lies are just plain embarrassing neo-Soviet garbage.

You haven't named a single friend of Russia. The US has NATO, Russia has NOTHING but empty lies like yours.

You follow the same path as the USSR, living in a world of self-delusion, and you will meet exactly the same fate.


Diana says:

"Soviet imperialism" ?
US attacked 28 states and 45 regions since WW2 and impeached development in so many tens of countries, killed millions of people in this world and you talk about "soviet imperialism?" . The only thing you know about politics is that Russia is a big country, lol.


wow gold says:

Florian-Geyer Str 32
01307 Dresden
Germany







Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/333