Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

China vs. Russia: A New Angle to Consider

Filed under: Russia

The New York Times reports:

Just as the speed and scale of China's rise as an economic power have no clear parallel in history, so its pollution problem has shattered all precedents. Environmental degradation is now so severe, with such stark domestic and international repercussions, that pollution poses not only a major long-term burden on the Chinese public but also an acute political challenge to the ruling Communist Party. And it is not clear that China can rein in its own economic juggernaut. Public health is reeling. Pollution has made cancer China's leading cause of death, the Ministry of Health says. Ambient air pollution alone is blamed for hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. Nearly 500 million people lack access to safe drinking water. Chinese cities often seem wrapped in a toxic gray shroud. Only 1 percent of the country's 560 million city dwellers breathe air considered safe by the European Union. Environmental woes that might be considered catastrophic in some countries can seem commonplace in China: industrial cities where people rarely see the sun; children killed or sickened by lead poisoning or other types of local pollution; a coastline so swamped by algal red tides that large sections of the ocean no longer sustain marine life.

View images of Chinese pollution-related horror here.

One reason that Russia could a face an expansive China gobbling up its far eastern regions is the population explosion in China. China has ten times more people than Russia, stuffed into a country with close to one-third Russia's land area. Russia's population is falling annually at the rate of 0.5% or more, whilst China's is growing at an even faster rate.

But now it becomes apparent that it is not merely China's size that will push its population outward; China is also toxifying its environment at an extremely rapid rate, perhaps rendering large chunks of its territory uninhabitable or certainly less than desirable. That means a triple whammy for Russia: Not only are Chinese motivated to seize its territory by growth, but also by pollution -- and on top of that, Russia is one of the countries that will most directly receive the spillover of Chinese pollution in the near term.

In response, Russia seems to be pursuing a policy of appeasement with China, even going so far as to conduct a recent round of joint war games. Can Russia really be so insular and ignorant that it thinks the Chinese won't notice Russia's virulent, pandemic racism and adopt Russia as a bosom friend? Does Russia really think it can talk its way out of Chinese territorial designs, matters of basic demographics? Didn't Russia learn anything from Stalin's deal with Hitler?

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


armchair pessimist says:

Hopefully, what is happening is stage 1 of a 2 stage plan.

Right now: Snarl loudly at the West and flash claws to demonstrate to all that Russia is nobody's poodle; many Russians feel they were treated as such back in the 90s, and are hopping p@ssed about it. That point having been driven home, Moscow will want to talk turkey with Washington, vulnerable superpower to vulnerable superpower about certain growing dangers to both nations. Maybe whatever moron we will have voted into office will be able to pay close attention.

This turkey dinner may yield the Russian equivalent of the Monroe doctrine. Too bad about Georgia, Ukraine, the Baltics, all those Kakastans. See my earlier comment about what the West would get out of the deal.


someguy says:

So, how long before China attempts to take Siberia?


La Russophobe says:

SOMEGUY:

Actually, they are already taking it. There are plenty of reports on how Russia is facing a problem of immigration out there very similar to what the US is dealing with in regard to Mexico, except that Russia doesn't have anything like the resources to devote to it that the US has. Before long, they may find Chinese is the de facto language and Siberia has been taken without firing a shot. Simple osmosis.

ARMCHAIR:

Interesting theory! If you are right, then it would stand to reason that they will "elect" a leader in 2008 who will be more palatable to the West. We shall see.


Gus says:

Don't count on enlightened intervention from the Russian electorate. They are enjoying Putin's ego trip and are as clueless as the leadership to their own long-term peril.

Na zderovye and have another vodka.


Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/353