Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Blogging Burma

Filed under:

3677693672.jpg

Ko Htike

Justice and Injustice

Dathana

Elizabeth Wong

Mizzima News

Yangon Thu

Voice of Burma

Global Voices

YouTube Burma Digest

Listed above are some voices attempting to blog information from within Burma to get the word out on what is going on there. It's being reported that bloggers within China are expressing support for the protesters. But one blogger reports that the government has shut down the country's internet connection and Western reports are depressingly garbled, unsure even as to whether monks have been killed or not as the junta's troops have repeatedly fired into the massive crowds seeking to disperse them. They say a Japanese photographer, Kenji Nagai (shown below lying wounded in the street still trying to snap photos) is among the fatalities.

28myanmar-600.jpg

The Bush Administration is imposing sanctions on the individual members of the junta, and even Laura Bush has boldly condemned the world's silence -- led chiefly by the malignant pairing of Russia and China, who have blocked responsive action in the U.N.

Can anyone explain to me how Russia, which is not only obstructing pro-democracy action in Burma but obliterating democracy at home in a nation that covers 11 time zones and giving the same diplomatic cover to Iran as it seeks to engulf the world in an atomic jihad, can be allowed a seat on the G-7 panel of leading democracies? Recall that in just a few months ago Russia announced its intention to build a nuclear reactor for the Burmese military junta, just as it is already doing for the maniacal ruler of Iran. Although the Bush administration, to its credit, is doing the right thing on Burma itself, where is our policy regarding Russia? Mired in catastrophe after Bush "looked into Putin's soul." Too bad he didn't manage to see Burma or Iran reflected there. Where are the reports of bloggers within Russia showing support for Burma? When, dear Lord, is the POTUS going to come to his senses and back away from his dear darling little friend Pooty-poot? Time is most surely running out.

View dramatic Washington Post photos of the carnage here.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Artfldgr says:

The reason that Russia is willing to help these regimes get nuclear weapons and abilities, is because it 'freezes' them to whatever politics they are at. the minute a nuclear test goes off, they enter a different level of game. once in which invasion and 3G force is not really an option.

without nuclear weapons a state is in flux, once having them, its much more solid in its form and is much harder to change.

in the constant game of global control, being able to freeze political pendulums when they are on the side you like is a very attractive notion.

not to mention there is a good buck in it.


hipotecas says:

Osama in Iran?

The Islamic Republic of Iran represents a clear and present danger to America. We are facing new threats, new capabilities, with very old and familiar intentions.

This is a regime whose leaders open official meetings with shouts of “Death to America.” This is a regime that has a long track record of murdering Americans, in Beirut, in Saudi Arabia, and in Iraq. Now this regime has acquired nuclear weapons capability.

Simply put, al Qaeda would not exist today as an organized force without the active material support from Iran.

Carlos Menendez
http://www.creditomagazine.es


Free Burma! says:

Free Burma!
International Bloggers' Day for Burma on the 4th of October

International bloggers are preparing an action to support the peaceful revolution in Burma. We want to set a sign for freedom and show our sympathy for these people who are fighting their cruel regime without weapons. These Bloggers are planning to refrain from posting to their blogs on October 4 and just put up one Banner then, underlined with the words „Free Burma!“.

www.free-burma.org


netzen says:

Someone argued that the struggle of influence among Nations for oil and energy resources, "quite inevitably" leads to a dictature in the oil-rich but less-educated countries in favour of the more industrialised and powerful ones. In the case of interest to us, he argued that it is the interest of India and China, the two largest clients of the burmese oil and gaz, to maintain a stupid dictature in Burma so to have easier deals and cheaper bargains.

I agree , indeed there are many examples even in other continents : Africa, Latin America.... and many companies playing that game (armements, oil, diamonds...). However not all the countries rich in resources are under a dictature. For example Canada is the 7th world oil producer and it seems to be a democracy. Kuwait with its 3 M inhabitants and oil resources is prosperous while Congo-Brazzaville has the same 3 M population and oil resources but the people are living in very poor conditions. Brazil and Nigeria have the same oil production but the former seems today in a much better position than the latter.

Do you agree on these examples ? Have you other constrasting cases ? Maybe by analysing the larger picture we can understand why in some countries the struggle for oil brings to dictature and in others not.

I have found an interesting analysis (Ferraro, 2003) of the perpetual dichotomy between national realism (making money for self without respect for the others) and idealism (non-negotiable demands of human dignity such as speech freedom, equal justice, etc.) which concludes like this :

"The clearest example of a certain continuity between realism and idealism was the Marshall Plan in 1947. The US granted a considerable amount of money to rebuild the European economy after World War II. That the US had a strong self-interest in doing so is incontestable-the US needed a vibrant European economy for its own economic self-interest. Moreover, the US also believed that European recovery was the best defense against possible Soviet expansion into Western Europe. At the same time, however, the people of Western Europe benefited from the policy. It is not impossible to satisfy the national interest while simultaneously satisfying the interests of others."

Can China and the other regional superpowers understand that ?

http://educateprotest.blogspot.com/


Creditos Rapidos says:

why anybody do something about this?


wow gold says:

publius



jordan shoes says:

we prefer to buy a pair of cheap nike Shoes if they'r the same of brand.we can feel it comfortable what brought
by Air Jordan Shoes,but also relaxing from Jordan Kicks.once u wear Jordan Shoes,even u think u'r the NO.1,
you'r be more confident than before .i like Jordan Shoes.


Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/400