Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Neo-Soviet Russia Obliterates its Internet

Filed under: Russia

21levy.190.jpgFour major news stories about the Russian Internet published in recent days show that the dictatorship of Vladimir Putin has launched an all-out assault seeking to obliterate this last vestige of freedom of expression and genuine information and finalize Russia's transition to a neo-Soviet regime.

First, scholar and blogger Paul Goble reported that new data indicates that access to the Internet is no longer growing, and in fact is shrinking. CNews reported stark results:

The internet subscriber base formed [in Russia] within the last half a year has decreased by 2 million this summer as compared to spring. According to the latest survey "Internet in Russia," carried out by FOM, the subscriber base using the internet for half a year came to 26.8 million this summer, which is by 1.9 million lower than in spring. Monthly internet user base has decreased by 2.4 million to 22.4 million. Thus, 24% of the population above 18 used the internet in summer.

Russia's Internet base, in other words, was already puny, but at least it was growing. Now, that's no longer the case. Other news indicated clearly that this result has been brought about directly by the Kremlin's policies, even as the incomes of ordinary Russians is supposedly rising, making them better able to afford access.

For instance, the New York Times reported that Russia has become the leading source of Internet corruption, with Russian hackers becoming "something akin to national heroes last spring when a wave of Internet attacks was launched from Russia against Web sites in Estonia, the former Soviet republic." In other words, Russia's corruption is essentially state-sponsored and being weaponized for political gain (that's the Times graphic at the top of the page). The Washington Post reported that Russia is now the world leader in online child pornography, spam generation and outright theft by fraud.

Next, the Post reported on how Russia, already having mobilized a malignant cadre of online terrorists to attack voices of dissent and having taken over all significant outlets of journalism in the print and television areas, is now aggressively looking to seize control of source material on the Internet.

And finally, the Ukrainian Internet hub Maidan reported that the Kremlin is using the tactics of cyber attack, previously employed against recalcitrant foreign governments like Estonia, against domestic human rights organizations, who had retreated to the Internet as their last bastion after years of relentless assaults on their non-virtual activities.

All this is happening even before Russia's upcoming parliamentary and presidential elections over the next few months, perhaps in an effort to assert even more control over the outcomes of those ballots. Do you dare to imagine what will occur when Russia's politicians are no longer constrained by them? Russia's Internet is on its last legs, and it is the last vestige of non-Soviet life. The time is now to act aggressively to protect it.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Artfldgr says:


Is it any wonder given their focus? That they are the first state to realize weaponization of the internet, and actually act on that, given that the first one to use a new crime/attack gets a free pass.

In other words, their system is so power based that they cant have as primary focus production before conquest (or potential conquest). They realize that if some of their people can use the internet to run long distance scams to free states, foul up state computers, steal information, and on and on…

Why the heck would they let such a weapon sit in the hands of the general population?

Given that they love stalin, one must also assume that, that which you love and admire you emulate.

"Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?" - Joseph Stalin

In this conceptual, the internet is infinitely more dangerous than the guns of revolution. While the restructuring of the political system allowed them to change how the west regareded the leadership, and let then run wild through the candy store stealing information… that was a boon… and the reverse was ALWAYS resisted, which is one reason why they cant get traction to move forward.

The internet, creates a situation where you have to allow an unorganized and unwatched population trade information at the node level, and that scale free network is what gives the super efficiencies.

Of course they are always trying to make a one sided coin, a left without a right, a dark without a light.

If you want the efficiencies that distributed computing and action in a free state has, you cant restrict the information and material flow for review purposes.

As much as the US hates the drug trade, unlike russia, they would never actually search all containers. The amount of material traded is too much… and so they weigh the situation against productivity, and such… and accept the negative that comes with the huge benefit.. while the Russian system, the goals of the party should be the goals of the people and the party does not suffer if they grind everything to a halt for their own reasons. the people suffer, but the party does not. and so they are willing to do such things.

So is it any wonder that they will see the internet as putting high explosives and such in the hands of the people that they don’t like (as the average people are not their proletariat, but the lumpen proletariat that has to be swept away), and who do not like them…

The key thing from that book I recommended was that she noted that when the state starts to be like this, you can no longer use the people as any kind of barometer. We forget how a westerner would visit, and the whole image promoted was Potemkin and false backed.

Same now.. the less transparent the state and press and such… the less anything the public says or seems tosay actually matters or means something. It would be like imagining walking around the city to talk to people in stalins era and that person would sit and gripe the way a westerner would about theirs. I have no doubt that the older people know whats coming, and so they are not talking and such to make sure that later there are no records as to their ‘true’ natures… (another reason why the net on the peoples side didn’t grow so fast, all the talk on the net exposes a persons inner natures and such, puts in in print, stamps it with a date and it can be saved for instant recall)

The younger people don’t believe the level that it will or can get, and so they blindly go on…

Meanwhile the democratic putin (at least in his eyes), is removing the most democratic system that has ever hit the planet or the species called man!!!

Yup. A real defender of freedom.


Tanvir says:

Many suspect that the Russians were involved in the cyber attacks on Estonian computer system. Cyber attacks which would probably be tough to trace back to the Russian government. Estonia was under Russian control until 1991, and they have advanced at a fast pace since. They have had tension with the Russians and probably will continue to have more. I just came across a website about the Singing Revolution - http://singingrevolution.com; when the Estonians revolted against the Russians.


Artfldgr says:

Cyber attacks which would probably be tough to trace back to the Russian government.

yeah.. their servers had the ip numbers, and the ip numbers come from the kremlin.. you know, when yuo have to register them with the central agency that dishes them out?

other states stepped in to help.. NATO and the US NSA, etc.. (NSA is the sigint specialists).

David Emm, a senior technology consultant for Russian rival Kaspersky Lab, added that Russia is normally the third-largest source of such attacks, produced by botnets, groups of malware-infected computers. However, he said a political attack of this nature was unusual. “The trend is now towards making money out of this stuff,” he says. “It's reminiscent of attacks 10 years ago – cyber-graffiti, not money-making.”

During the attack, Estonia was aided by Nato, of which it is a relatively recent member. A Nato spokesperson says its support included staff from the organization's round-the-clock information security operation being sent to Estonia, and the attacks being discussed in a telephone conversation between Estonia's president and Nato's secretary-general. “This has been pretty furious, it's been quite unusual in the scale of the attacks,” he said.
Infosecurity Europe coverage on p10, interview with Eugene Kaspersky at infosecurity-magazine.com

the other thing would be... who the heck in the world OTHER than the dumas would care about a statue?

the chinese would not hint at their capability by wasting it on a russian statue.. the koreans?

american kids who might play international games with their botnets wouldnt care about the statue..

it was like someone stealing something worthless... and veryone knows who did it beacuse it only has SENTIMENTAL value to one.

meanwhile, the siloviki dont care much about the politics, as they are the money arm... what do they care about a statue? its hard to believe the kind of patriot that would care, and then turn around and keep raping their own people economically.

nope.. no other place could be the source..

one thing to note is that the latvians, estonians and lithuanians have had a deep dislike for the russians for obvious reasons. so when the main body reorganized, these baltic states worked much harder to remove those who had connections back. though they cant remove them all any more than the US can, they did remove a large amount of them...

and the result? prosperity.. note that estonia is one of the most internet developed ex soviet states...

contrast that with this article in that russia is shutting it down.

russian leadership ALWAYS errs on the side of caution with someting that has dual use. they are sociopaths, and as such know the concept of give an inch take a mile, more than non psyhopathic people. they live on that process... its like a probiscuss to a mosquito...


Robert Mayer says:

Tanvir -- Thanks for the link, I actually just discovered that website as well yesterday. I want to get a screening quite badly ;)


Russian says:

What a picture! Who is the artist? Kim?
Is this a Halloween trick-or-treating?
No candies for you, Kim! A Hallooween mask with vampire teeth are missing!

As about the content, my comment is:
Kim's unsupported speculations.

The article in reference:

http://eng.cnews.ru/news/top/indexEn.shtml?2007/10/16/270793

clearly states that there are economic, technical and phsycological factors involved, and no single word about the government messing up.

Quotations from the article:

(According to the sociologists, one can speak about the decrease in the growth rate of the internet subscribers. ‘The main factor impeding with the internet development in the regions is the provider monopolism and high subscription fees, - Ephim Galitsky, FOM Senior Specialist says.)

(...one can speak about a certain decrease in the growth rate of the internet subscriber base, however, the market is changing in quality: broadband access penetration is becoming more and more evident.)
Broadband, as you know, costs more.

(... the principle when people connect to the internet because their friends have already done it does not work any longer).

And the article is optimistic about Russia's Internet future:

(...the alternative providers have started operating in the regions...

...Alexander Malis, Corbina Telecom Director General: FOM statements regarding high internet subscription fees in the regions are right...
I can assure Corbina is interested in improving the given situation. We are actively penetrating into the regions. While the subscriber fee in the regions should be cut not 2-3 fold, but 10-30 fold’)

(...In some Western European countries more than 60% of the population is using the internet.... in Moscow such a level might be gained only in 2009, while it might take much longer to achieve the given indices across Russia in general.
... Mr. Malis is more optimistic. He is sure, the internet subscriber base in Russia might exceed 60% in 2-3 years.)

SO! I would say, your word perhaps in the fifth line from the bottom is the only word in the publication which may be worth of reading, and only if but most likely not is added.


It looks like Internet is not a problem for the mean, evil, malignant, barbaric, agressive, terrorist-Hugo Chavez-arming, journalists-killing, Putin dictatorship, neo-Soviet regime. You know why? The main propaganda tool in Russia is TV.
Users of Internet are below 30% of Russian population, and 90% of them are not good in English, and therefore they do not read La Russophobe blog and even Publius Pundit which are certainly the main threat.

As about the hackers, Russia is just the third, after USA and China in this kind of fun.
Russian hackers want to be good programmers. This is a kind of workshop for them. A lot of them work for "Microsoft" after that.
So, be appreciative for Russia together with India providing the USA with good computer cadres.

To Artfldgr

How are you doing, buddy? Do you have anti-Spyware program in you computer? Those bloody commies could send you a bug.


elmer says:

Another proud moment for moron russkies:

Let's see what kind of excuses, er, rationalizations, Russian can come up with for this one.

Perhaps the Queen of England is actually to blame.

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/10/30/europe/EU-GEN-Ukraine-Web-Attack.php


excerpt follows:

Russian nationalists claim responsibility for attack on Yushchenko's Web site
The Associated PressPublished: October 30, 2007


KIEV, Ukraine: Hackers from several countries launched a massive attack and temporarily disabled the Web site of Ukraine's Western-leaning President Viktor Yushchenko, his office said Tuesday. A Russian nationalist group claimed responsibility.

The attacks from servers in Russia, Britain, Kazakhstan, the United States, Israel and Ukraine began Sunday night and continued through Tuesday afternoon, the presidential press service told The Associated Press.

Over 18,000 attacks have been carried out, temporarily blocking access to the site. The Web page could not be accessed Tuesday night.

A radical Russian nationalist youth group, the Eurasian Youth Movement, claimed responsibility for the attacks in their blog, saying it was their retaliation for Yushchenko's office's alleged attack of their on Web site, which had been disabled.

The group called Yushchenko's government a "fascist regime" and accused it of attacking the organization's Moscow office. Yushchenko's office denied the claims.


Russian Bear says:

RE: "Other news indicated clearly that this result has been brought about directly by the Kremlin's policies..."

What policies? What? What? What?
Do the Kremlin wants everybody who wishes to subscribe for Internet to bring a permit from the KGB? Are people banned to subscribe for their political vews? Do the Kremlin shutting the Telecommunication companies providing Internet services?
What are you talking about, crazy fool? Read the links carefully.


Artfldgr says:

What policies? What? What? What?

its not so much the official policy on paper...

what it is is people being smart. as i said in another post.. most of these people have lived in the other time..

they know, due to several prior histories, that loosenning has often been followed by a tightening. and with that, the work, the comments, and other things, come back to nail them.. (which was the purpose of loosening - germans, russians and chinese have done this several times)


so if the social reasons are not valid for them cause they would rather keep there mouth shut.. they remember that what you looked at was used to assign them...

there really is no need for them to be on the net.. they dont have the money to buy things from the west... they are not using the net as part of the job and part of improving business efficiency...

and their life experience will shy away from anything that might expose their inner self, vs their outer image.


so the system probably topped out with the young and inexperienced... the naive... if things work out, then it will be ok.. if they dont, then they will be the target of the blame for why things didnt work out. after all, they used the net to get their orders... etc.

its been done before... several times...

so its hard to tell now... if lucy with the footbal is being sincere, or will she pull it out from under tham..

remember the brave were all killed.. those willing to try new things were killed... those with natural skill at business, were killed...

by the way... an interesting fact i read recently... in the book the millionare next door... they point out immigrants that tend to become millionaires.. russians are one of the most successful if not the most successful groups.. seems the ones that left and werent killed are VERY capable of making things work... but they are not going to go back.. and the ones that are there now.. they have learned through 90 years of lessons that being a success, and doing well, and working hard.. is WAY too dangerous.. after all, the man who does that has stuff stolen (like my freind who was doing well, and they took his car).. but the man that has little and does nothing. is left alone.. in fact men in the west, given the law changes are doing the same thing slowly... after all, a man who is successful can get bled dry from his lady at the whim of the state.. so better to have nothing and screw everyone, than have a lot, and get screwed by one. this is the kind of thought that such systems create as a normal state of mind.. and why they cant just spring up even if the gate is held open for them.

what your seeing is the differnce between normal humansin the west.. and homo sapiens domesticus.. they are domesticated.. even if you leave the door open, they wont fly. too many have forgotten how, and are way too afraid to..








Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/452