Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

All Hell Breaks Loose in Pakistan

Filed under: Pakistan

0600ad26-0923-4817-bc95-e8d23a1bf1f9_ms.jpeg

First she's free. Then she's not. Then she is again. And then she's not. You'd think her last name was Gandhi.

Pakistani freedom fighter Benazir Bhutto was back under arrest in Lahore yesterday, her headquarters there besieged by nearly 1,000 soldiers to prevent her from carrying out a protest march to Islamabad. The U.S. responded by dispatching an emergency mission led by Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte to try to convince the clearly demented military dictator General Pervez Musharraf to release his grip on the nation's jugular. And Bhutto announced that her party may be forced to boycott the coming elections, creating a national crisis. When asked whether she might flee the country, she boldly declared: "I prefer to live in Pakistan in jail than to leave."

Go baby, go! We're coming over, and we won't come back til it's over over there!

Those who love democracy can't help but be stirred by this courage, nor can they do other than heap scorn on places like Russia where a cowardly mass population prefers their craven "safety" to safeguarding their liberty. After all, despite her direct confrontation of the regime of a military dictator, Bhutto is still alive, and capturing the imagination of the world, because of the rock-solid support she's getting from the people she's risking everything to liberate. Anna Politkovskaya can hardly say the same. Yesterday, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin clearly stated he is no different from Musharraf, declaring: "If the people vote for [my party] United Russia [in Russia's upcoming parliamentary elections], it means that a clear majority of the people put their trust in me, and in turn that means I will have the moral right to hold those in the Duma and the Cabinet responsible for the implementation of the tasks that have been set as of today. In what form I will do this, I cannot yet give a direct answer. But various possibilities exist." To be sure he will "win," Putin has barred access to Russia's polls by foreign observers and seized the campaign literature of rival parties while refusing to engage in public debate with them. Stalin, redux.

Where is Russia's Bhutto? Nowhere to be seen.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Vova says:

Perhaps she is a freedom-fighter but unlike Khodorkovskiy she and the other Pakistani oligrachs, e.g., Sharifs, stole the money fair and square. Besides, I am not sure the lady can handle the mullahs and crazed up islamist.
As for the Malignant Little Troll, he's no dictator. Dicrator assumes a human, and he is manifestly not human. Sorry for the bad news.
Musharraf is not His Imperial Majesty the Shah of Aryans but he's the only one who can keep things under control. He may be imperfect but unlike the leaders of "Russia" he is human


David M says:

The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the - Web Reconnaissance for 11/13/2007 A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...so check back often.


Vova says:

This is verbatim from Hon. John Bolton: Pakistan. Our interests and our values are not fully consistent when it comes to Pakistan now. Our overriding interest (even more important than attacking al Qaeda and the Taliban) is to make sure Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, or parts thereof, don't fall into the hands of Islamic fundamentalists. Mursharraf represents our best hope of preventing that result, so we should support him in the near term. It's a mistake, moreover, to see the clash between Musharraf and Bhutto as "white hats vs. black hats." Bhutto is suspect as a force for democracy. Her title within her party is "chairperson for life."


La Russophobe says:

Mr. Bolton can say what he likes only because he's living in a country that lets him. Mr. Musharraf may be unable to hold on to power unless we use military force to crush the democratic opposition, which isn't going to happen. Mr. Musharraf has taken many actions which have undermined nuclear security, to say nothing of failing to deliver Bin Laden. He's old news. He's toast. So Mr. Bolton would be better advised to explain how we can best secure Pakistan's nukes after Bhutto takes power, as Charles Krauthammer has advised in piece several days ago that we linked to here:

http://publiuspundit.com/2007/11/bhutto_under_arrest.php


Vova says:

Re "how we can best secure Pakistan's nukes" is like securing virginity after you've spent a lifetime in a whorehouse. Pakistan is an artificial country, worse than Belgium, and as far as the nukes, the train has left the station, so the best bet is that they disintegrate, and the Hindu Indianns and Sikhs pick up the pieces and get the nukes


Aris Katsaris says:

Vova, I don't care about your hyperboles -- at some point your rhetoric becomes so extreme that it reaches the points of insanity and shuts down the possibility of discussion altogether.

Putin and everyone else you despise are humans, whether you like it or not. They are vile humans, but humans nonetheless.

"so the best bet is that they disintegrate, and the Hindu Indianns and Sikhs pick up the pieces and get the nukes"

Nifty. Can you tell us how you will possibly ensure that the pieces will indeed go to those religious minorities that you personally prefer?


Russ says:

I know my comments have a magical way of not appearing on this blog since I dared to disagree with you, but Kim, you might want to check out this LA Times editorial on your "ultimate protest babe" there:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-bhutto14nov14,0,2482408.story?coll=la-opinion-center


Josh says:

That LA Time comment by Bhutto's niece is a joke. First of all the LA Times is known as a liberal hotbed for wingbats, so they'll print anything that makes Bush look bad. Secondly, the "niece" clearly looks jealous of her aunt. If you ask me, I wouldn't be surprised if the niece was paid this by Russian security services who don't want to see America succeed in Pakistan or anywhere else. Someday we'll have to fact the fact that we won't solve Venezuela or Pakistan or any problems, until we get rid of the malignant Putin in Russia.



Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/481