Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Chavismo Without Chavez?

Filed under: Venezuela

The former foreign minister of Mexico, Jorge Castaneda, now a political scientist at NYU, has a piece in the New Republic analyzing Hugo Chavez of Venezuela. He believes we will now see increased radicalism and recalcitrance from Chavez, including going ahead with planned reforms regardless of the popular will, and that this opens a window of opportunity for Chavez opponents:

According to most accounts, both [former defense Minister General] Baduel and the military high command forced Chavez to accept his defeat under certain conditions, and threatened to remove him if he refused. One can easily contemplate a scenario whereby many chavistas would prefer to remain in power, pursue both the socialist and populist policies of the past few years, continue to considerably enrich themselves, and maintain more independence from Washington than in the past, but without the endless domestic and foreign conflicts generated by their current leader's personality and excesses. They might prefer to follow the path of what many are calling "chavismo without Chavez." This course is all the more likely if it turns out that the Caracas caudillo simply cannot sit still or remain silent. The opposition's victory on December 2 ushered in a new stage in Venezuelan--and Latin American--politics. But it did not determine where things will head. Much will depend on what the Venezuelan people decide--but part of the likely upheavals will also stem from what the rest of the region, Europe, and the United States do. For the moment, they do not seem to have a clue about what to do with Chavez.

Will this be yet another foreign policy opportunity missed by the Bush administration as it continues to obsess over the Middle East?

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Vova says:

Kim, do you remember the autogolpe? I am more reserved making predictions, especially knowing Venezuela and it people (and I love the country and her people).
As to "another foreign policy opportunity missed by the Bush" I do not recal any he hasn't... Like the Strobe of darkness who made 19 prediction about the then "soviet union" only to discover that every one of them was wrong... Perhaps he smoked too much dope with Bill in England...


La Russophobe says:

It seems you have good reason to admire them given their astounding performance in the last election! We hope as much as you do that this will be only one step along a path towards becoming a prosperous, free country governed by intelligent humans rather than monstrous apes.

Speaking of which, Bush does give every sign of condemning his regime to the ashcan of history, so unnecessary, he seemed to show such promise after 9/11 and had so many opportunities to write glorious pages in history. Makes one look forward to the coming election most eagerly.


wow gold says:

publius





Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/551