Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Condoleezza Rice Gives us Half a Loaf on Russia

Filed under:

ricex-large.jpgU.S. Secretary of State had a roundtable discussion with the editors of the USA Today newspaper on December 11th. Here's what she said about Vladimir Putin's announcement that he wants his sycophant Dmitri Medvedev to succeed him (other topics were discussed at much greater length, click through the link to read the transcript):

When asked what kind of president she thought of Medvedev would be and about the manner of his elevation, she initially responded: "Well, I guess they're still going to have an election in March." At that, the room burst into laughter. The questioner then observed "they used to have elections in Communist . . ." and Rice interrupted saying: "They did, and 99.9 percent."

Then she stated: "Look, I think we've made it very clear that we think democratic processes have taken a step back in Russia, and the elections even for the Duma were not up to international standards. It's been very difficult for opposition to operate in that country. It's been very difficult for them to have access to the press, access to assembly. You've had people arrested. It's not an environment in which you can talk about free and fair elections. I would hope that the time will come when Russia is going into a presidential election where there is a realistic chance for a really contested election, and I think that, to me, is the biggest problem with this."

So, clearly and unequivocally, the U.S. Secretary of State, a diplomat, mocked and condemned the basic electoral processes of a fellow G-8 member. It's hard to understate the scathing, contemptuous tone of these remarks, given that they are coming to us in diplomaticspeak. So far, so good. This is real American leadership, something to be proud of.

But then, as seems to have been the hallmark of the Bush administration, Condi jumps the rails with two additional points. First, she says: "I do know Dmitri Medvedev, I met him on a number of occasions. And he is a very intelligent person, he is of another generation." That's just not true. Medvedev received his college diploma when Russia was the USSR, and in the very same place and in the very same subject as Vladimir Putin. They studied "law" in a country that didn't even know the meaning of the word. In other words, he has no education at all, save for one in Communist propaganda. It's a remark that sounds, eerily, like what her boss said about Putin himself when he "looked into his eyes and saw his soul" eight years ago. It sounds like Condi is falling in Putin's trap, doing exactly what he wants her to do.

Second, when asked whether Medvedev had secret KGB ties and would be a lackey of Putin, she replies: "I can't read that. I'm not sure, by the way, anybody can. Events will unfold and he will carry out his responsibilities. I think we'll just have to watch this space and see how this all plays out." Watch this space? Watch the USA Today newspaper to find out what is going on in Russia? Yikes! (By the way, "this space" is actually a PDF document, her comments appeared in a link within a story focusing on her discussion of Israel not in the paper itself; you can hear her comments in audio file links also found in that story if you are so inclined, including her Russia remarks). Is she telling us we should drop our guard and wait for Putin to slug us in the gut before we take action to protect ourselves? Is she saying that notwithstanding all her brutal comments about how Putin is crushing democracy in Russia, we should stand idly by and gape while he snuffs out the last flickering embers of freedom and consolidates his dictatorship?

It really does begin to seem that this administration is a spent force. Thankfully, the winds of change are already blowing. Things are going from the frying pan to the fire in Russia, and remarks like these are the type that could live in the infamy of history. Little time remains for the Bush administration to get Russia right. Noted Russian scholar Andrei Illarionov has more words of criticism for Condi in the Washington Post. If she cares about her legacy, she'll heed them immediately.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Vova says:

So poor Condi can't find better things to do than talk to the leftie McNews... The sad thing about the nice lady is that she has never had to compete for a job in her life... As to "democratic processes have taken a step back in Russia"--the hasn't been any in years, and "the elections even for the Duma were not up to international standards"--there were no elections. Selection without election as Zhenia Albats calls it.
Don't count on Condi or her boss. They are not just lame ducks--they are held hostage to vicious and vile leftist un-American russophile media and political class. Should Condi's boss make a body movement contrary to the malignant rat, our Rosenbergs and Streichers will unleash an orgy of deranged propaganda, calling Bush a hatemongering racist and warmonger.
An old friend of mine, an ex-intel guy, and staunch righ-winger who knows Condi personally, says he'd rather have Hill and Bill as president than her


Artfldgr says:

My take, since Condi went to school in soviet russia is that she is more wishing that they did things with more polish. after all, ALL the candidates in the US are members of CFR, and yet, we all believe that a vote for one isnt a vote for CFR, we dont even notice it.

to me, thats more of what she is lamenting...

kind of like

"oh how much easier everything will be when they get their act together and are more nuanced in what they do. that way, we wont have to have these kinds of talks over validity (nor worry about outcomes either)"


James says:

I would argue that it is precisely her background as a Sovietologist that makes Condi Rice such an inappropriate voice on Russia policy. She is willing to extend such exceptional circumstances and patience to the Russians, whom she believes she understands better than other governments. No wonder the double standards argument never dies down.


Ray says:

James:
You're absolutely right..our highest posts in foreign policy should be run by people who are completely ignorant of the countries, cultures and regions they oversee...ignorance is knowledge... brilliant, absolutely brilliant



Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/541