Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Interesting Developments on the Campaign Trail

Filed under: US Elections

GR2007121200190.gifThe graphic at left from the Washington Post shows two Republican candidates surging in national opinion polls, while three others plummet. What do the surgers (Huckabee and Romney) have in common? The are both former governors of a state. Other than former vice presidents, nobody since JFK has been elected to the Oval Office without first being a governor (Dubya, Clinton, Reagan & Carter were govs -- while Bush Sr., Nixon and Johnson were all veeps). And remember, JFK only barely became president, with one of the narrowest margins of victory in history and no popular majority. He didn't, of course, even serve out his first term. Eisenhower was the last president to serve a complete term without previously having been veep or gov, and he's clearly an extreme case, having been the victorious general of World War II. Herbert Hoover was the last "normal" president to serve a full term without the veep/gov credential, and his presidency was a total failure.

Huckabee is now the frontrunner in the Iowa caucus polls, and the Post correlates his rise with a change of focus from the Middle East (we report good news on Iran below, and have previously reported on the impressive progress made in Iraq) to domestic issues -- where gubernatorial credentials would obviously be much more weighty. Matt Drudge says the Democrats will be happy if Huckabee is anointed, viewing him as an "easy kill" in the general election. Hmmm . . . isn't that what they said about governor Dubya in 2004 against non-governor Kerry? With totally unqualified non-governors Obama and Hillary as their choices, perhaps the Democrats should think again.

In other news, Republicans won a devastating victory in an Ohio special congressional election yesterday, despite a determined onslaught by the Democrats to seize the seat. So much for the absurd notion that the country has gone over to the Blue side.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton has lost one-fourth of her support among female Democratic voters in New Hampshire, and is now receiving the support of a pathetic one-third of all such voters, dropping her into a statistical tie with Barack Obama in the key first primary. I have heard speculation that Bill is intentionally sabotaging Hillary with a string of gaffs because he can't stand the idea of not being the only president the family.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Americaneocon says:

I liked this:

"Asked which candidate best reflects the core values of the Republican Party, 18 percent said McCain, Giuliani and Huckabee were each cited by 16 percent, 14 percent picked Romney, and 13 percent named Thompson. As if to punctuate the confusion, 16 percent said they had no opinion."

The Arizona Senator's my man.


La Russophobe says:

Mine too! Go McCain! And if he doesn't win, he should be named the next ambassador to the Russian dictatorship.


Artfldgr says:

Thompson almost gets no coverage... and yet, people know about him... everyone else is getting lots of coverage comparitively.


La Russophobe says:

That is what being a movie/tv star will do for you. He should thank his lucky stars that his oft-idiotic statements are not getting reported much.


Gus says:

I refuse to believe that Huckabee's "surge" is anything more than Democrat/mainstream media wishful thinking to goad GOP voters into nominating a disastrous candidate.

Fiscally, he is no conservative. His "turn the other cheek" brand of Christianity--as evidenced by aggressive pardoning of criminals who repented and accepted Christ as their Savior is not the type of focus we need as a wartime Commander in Chief.

This country faces one ruthless enemy in radical Islam and potentially many more around the world in the coming years--including a revanchist Russia. Radical Islamists are fully capable of talking peace while embracing us in a death hug. We need a President who is tough, courageous and exhibits ruthlessness equal to that of our enemies. We certainly do not need a Baptist minister who is perfectly willing to forgive "repentant" monsters, but still harbors Neanderthalic views about fellow citizens who represent no existential threat to the U.S.A.--gays.

Huckabee will not be the next President if he is nominated. Obama could even beat him. If somehow he were to be elected, he would be a Republican Jimmy Carter and would usher in four equally as disastrous years. Given the dangers we now face, I am not sure we could survive such an experience.

Any other candidate is preferable. However, McCain, Guliani and Thompson certainly exhibit enough of the above mentioned qualities and would be better choices.


Gus says:

I refuse to believe that Huckabee's "surge" is anything more than Democrat/mainstream media wishful thinking to goad GOP voters into nominating a disastrous candidate.

Fiscally, he is no conservative. His "turn the other cheek" brand of Christianity--as evidenced by aggressive pardoning of criminals who repented and accepted Christ as their Savior is not the type of focus we need as a wartime Commander in Chief.

This country faces one ruthless enemy in radical Islam and potentially many more around the world in the coming years--including a revanchist Russia. Radical Islamists are fully capable of talking peace while embracing us in a death hug. We need a President who is tough, courageous and exhibits ruthlessness equal to that of our enemies. We certainly do not need a Baptist minister who is perfectly willing to forgive "repentant" monsters, but still harbors Neanderthalic views about fellow citizens who represent no existential threat to the U.S.A.--gays.

Huckabee will not be the next President if he is nominated. Obama could even beat him. If somehow he were to be elected, he would be a Republican Jimmy Carter and would usher in four equally as disastrous years. Given the dangers we now face, I am not sure we could survive such an experience.

Any other candidate is preferable. However, McCain, Guliani and Thompson certainly exhibit enough of the above mentioned qualities and would be better choices.


talnik says:

"...the Democrats will be happy if Huckabee is anointed, viewing him as an "easy kill" in the general election"
The Democrats seem to enter these contests with the assumption their opponent is stupid and/or weak; it's painfully obvious and nearly always bites them in the end.
And yes, anticipating someone will say "but GWB IS stupid!!", that just proves my point. He may well be stupid, but Gore and Kerry are more so. More stupider.


steve frank says:

No religous candidates...Rudy or McCain only. Mitt and the Huckster can stick it.



Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/540