Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Joe Kennedy as Hugo Chavez's Little Bitch

Filed under: Venezuela

Joseph-P.-Kennedy-II.jpg

The Wall Street Journal reported one year ago:
Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez is an ally of the Iranian mullahs, a supporter of North Korea, a close friend of Fidel Castro and a good customer for Vladimir Putin's weapon factories. Now he's also a business partner of Joseph P. Kennedy II [shown above standing beneath the Venezuelan flag]. The former Democratic Congressman describes the deal he's cooked up with Mr. Chavez as charity for low-income consumers of heating oil. But it's worth asking what the price of this largesse is to Venezuelans and to U.S. security interests. The arrangement is this: Mr. Chavez's Citgo -- a Houston-based oil company owned by the Venezuelan government -- is supplying home heating oil to Mr. Kennedy's Citizens Energy Corporation at a 40% discount. Citizens, a nonprofit outfit, says it passes the savings onto the poor, aiming to help 400,000 homes in 16 states that would otherwise have trouble heating their homes. In the process, Mr. Kennedy happens to get a high-profile publicity plug. If you think you qualify, says the television ad that drew our attention to this partnership, just dial 1-877-Joe-4-Oil.

Joe-4-Oil is now running an aggressive ad campaign on network TV. He says he knows many people think he's crazy and evil for cooperating with Chavez, but he's sure it's the right thing to do. Jimmy Carter was also convinced:

jimmy-carter-hugo-chavez.jpg

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Josh Fogel says:

Kennedy, Carter, Communism. All synonyms. Way to call it out. But do you need to use violent misogynist words like "little bitch"? I know you're being ironic, but this is how we become desensitized to misogyny and other forms of repression and violence.


Artfldgr says:

how is using the proper term for a female dog mysogynist? unless you are a woman and think of yourself that way... (which many feminists do since they get offended as to things that they arent even a part of, like such a phrase). the fact that you see that as automatically mysogynist, especially when its being used as misandry, shows a remarkable ability to twist reality. and your desire to control what others say and think, rather than control what you think and say, shows remarkable childishness and such.

the person that was called little bitch was a man... making it misandrist, not misogynist... your money in college would have been better spent on empiracle classes rather than ideological concepts sourced from the communists and revolutionary politics designed to destroy the culture that is the bulwork of society and its safety.

[domesticated animals cant fight against non domesticated ones. russia and the communist countries are not doing to their own, what our left is doing to us, and so our men will NOT be like the men who stepped forward in wwii, but will be over run, and all too willing to vote their imprisionment (AND womens imprisonment and enslavement to the state), for having no purpose, being hated, and so forth. there WILL eventually come a time as we have not managed to conquer people who think destabilization to increase raw material prices, are a right way to live.)

do some reasearch... modern feminism was sourced from the commiterns last orders to the western fellow travelors. its in the congresional record like many. check out sanger as a eugenicist that hitler copied. check out the foudners and women currently working who want communism (they say so, so why follow them)..

ever notived that more women are barren today than ever in the history of man? that they have self destroyed their own gentic contribution to the future? that they have also destroyed the very foundations of the socieyt that gave them more than any other society in the history of man?

when the nike brouhaha started, did yuou notive that the women who make them were described as living in barracks? that women in this regime are tools of the state? that rather than they work for their own family, the state wants them to work for the wealthy or the elite (Take your pick. elite in communism, etc - or elite in fascism (socialism & capitalism)).

they figured they could trick the women from working towards their own genetic contributions (which dilute those of the top), by making them too busy, and pissed off at their own biology, that they will abandon their OWN interests and then work for the state... which promises to give them more... but the state has not as much interest as a man who loves them and would provide. in fact the states idea is to keep them poor that way they can work for the productivity of the soviet communist revolution.


everything since suffarage women earned by themselves, and these harpies took credit, and hurt them...

why else make sanger a feminist hero, and twist the history of einstien to make milosivic a hero... but totally ignore emmy noester... the MATHMETICIAN that inspired einstein (and he said so!).

well, sanger gave us soft eugenics sold as empowerment... so she is an IDEOLOGICAL hero that is helping to create a soviet state, by causeing the capable and the indipendent and those with concience an care, to off their own children...


but emmy? she succeeded when women werent supposed to succeed (most dont realize that before the baby boom in the US the schools had women in attendance at over 40%. it was having families that made that number plummet). she also succeeded because of men that saw her talent and would not deny talent from ANY source... and so forth.


she doesnt hold up the myth, and so she is written out of the feminist lexicon, as stalin wrote out those inconveniences...

and they wrote in and twisted sanger.

"The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it." -- Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race, (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
.
"Birth control: to create a race of thoroughbreds." -- Margaret Sanger, Birth Control Review, November 1921, (vol. V, no. 11); p.2.
.
"More children from the fit, less from the unfit—that is the chief aim of birth control." -- Margaret Sanger, Birth Control Review, May 1919 (vol. III, no. 5); p.12.
.
"The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." -- Margaret Sanger, letter to Clarence Gamble, Dec. 10,1939. - Sanger manuscripts, Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College. (Dec. 10 is the correct date of the letter. There is a different date circulated, e.g. Oct. 19, 1939; but Dec. 10 is the correct date of Ms Sanger's letter to Mr. Gamble.)
.

personally i would be appalled to be a part of such things...

and this goes doubly since they want communism...

"Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism." - Catharine A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (First Harvard University Press, 1989), p.10
"A world where men and women would be equal is easy to visualize, for that precisely is what the Soviet Revolution promised." - Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (New York, Random House, 1952), p.806
"The Women's Caucus [endorses] Marxist-Leninist thought." -- Robin Morgan, Sisterhood is Powerful, p. 597


and triply because they ignroe and consign women such as this to nothingness... because this woman doesnt serve their ideological purpose (which is why they stopped fighting about genital mutilation. they are afraid of the rad islamics who play rougher than they do, and whom their men will not defend them. check out fjordman and whats happening in malmo with gang rapes as part of dhimmi law)

and what about emmy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Noether

do note the time... (most dont realize that there were womens colleges. for instance i heard a feminsit say that before x year no woman earned a degree at harvard... which is HALF true... since harvard built radcliff the all girls harvard... so until they both went co-ed, no a wopman would get her degree at radcliffe)
note that she did it all on her own.. and merit was the key to open the doors... and she did it on her own interest and such, and didnt ahve to give up the family and such.

this is not a good feminist... she doesnt need women taking credit for her individual acheivment... she does not need women diluting womens ability with affirmative action that then makes any winner into a loser...

Merit was her key!!!!!

and today, that key is no longer open to women, even if they have it... cant sully the water, and then claim purity. cant get special help (like 8a sba programs) and then claim that your equal to those that dont get it, even if your better!

and if you use other ways to chose people then merit becomes secondary. we dont pick the best person anymore, we try to juggle things that on one hand we claim doesnt exist: race, and on the other hand are useful in power politics: race. so there now is no way to know if a woman got her place by hard work, affirmative action, diversity skewing, lawsuit avoidance, etc...

read about her... someone young women should hear about more... (but since she doestn exemplify the sociailst totalitarian stuff, she is stalinized out of history)


http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/noether.htm

Emmy Noether


March 23, 1882 - April 14, 1935


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written by Mandie Taylor, Class of 1998 (Agnes Scott College)
Traditionally, people consider mathematicians to be men. This, however, is not entirely true. Throughout history, there have been many women mathematicians who have contributed just as much as their male-counterparts. Even though their names might have been forgotten, their contributions to mathematics have not. One of these women mathematicians was German-born Emmy Noether.

Emmy Noether was born in Erlangen, Germany on March 23, 1882. She was named Amalie, but always called "Emmy". She was the eldest of four children, but one of only two that survived childhood. Her brother, Fritz also made a career of mathematics. Her father was Max Noether, a noted mathematician of his time. Her mother was Ida Amalie, for whom Emmy was named.

As a child, Emmy Noether did not concentrate on mathematics. She spent her time in school studying languages, with a concentration on French and English. Her mother taught her the traditional skills of a young woman of that time. She learned to cook, clean, and play the clavier. At the time of her graduation from high school, she passed a test that allowed her to teach both French and English at schools for young women.

At the age of 18, Emmy Noether decided to take classes in mathematics at the University of Erlangen. Her brother, Fritz, was a student there, and her father was a professor of mathematics. Because she was a woman, the university refused to let Emmy Noether take classes They granted her permission to audit classes. She sat in on classes for two years, and then took the exam that would permit her to be a doctoral student in mathematics. She passed the test, and finally was a student in good standing at the University. After five more years of study, she was granted the second degree to a woman in the field of mathematics. The first graduated a year earlier.

Now that Emmy Noether had her doctorate in mathematics, she was ready to find a job teaching. The University of Erlangen would not hire her, as they had a policy against women professors. She decided to help her father at the Mathematics Institute in Erlangen. She began doing research there, and helped her father by teaching his classes when he was sick. Soon, she began to publish papers on her work.

During the ten years Emmy worked with her father, Germany became involved in World War I. Emmy was a pacifist at heart, and hated the war. She longed for a Germany that was not at war. In 1918, her wish was granted, as the war ended. The German monarchy was removed and the country became a republic. Noether, and all women in Germany, were given the right to vote for the first time. Even with the new rights granted to women, Noether was not paid for her work teaching.

During this time, Felix Klein and David Hilbert were working on further defining one of Einstein's theories at the University of Gottingen. They felt that Emmy Noether's expertise could help them in their work. They asked her to come and join then, but since there were no women on the faculty, Noether was unsure if she would be welcome. Many of the faculty did not want her there, but in the end, she came. She worked hard and soon was given a job as a lecturer. Even though she still was not paid for her efforts, for the first time, Noether was teaching under her own name. Three years later, she began receiving a small salary for her work.

During her time at the University of Gottingen, she accumulated a small following of students known as Noether's boys. These students traveled from as far as Russia to study with her. Noether was a warm person who cared deeply about her students. She considered her students to be like family and was always willing to listen to their problems. Her teaching style was very difficult to follow, but those who caught on to her fast style became loyal followers. Noether's teaching method led her students to come up with ideas of their own, and many went on to become great mathematicians themselves. Many credited Noether for her part in teaching them to teach themselves.

Peace-loving Noether was soon to wish for peace again. In 1933, Hitler and the Nazis came into power in Germany. The Nazis demanded that all Jews be thrown out of the universities. Noether's brother, Fritz, was also a professor at the time. Offered a teaching position in Siberia, he moved his family there. Even though friends tried to get Emmy a position at the University of Moscow, she opted to move to the United States, where Bryn Mawr College offered her a position teaching.

Emmy Noether taught at Bryn Mawr College until her death in 1935. Teaching at a women's college was very different for Noether. For the first time, she had colleagues that were women. Anna Pell Wheeler, another woman mathematician, was the head of the department at Bryn Mawr, and became a great friend of Noether. Wheeler understood about how Emmy had to struggle to have a career in mathematics in Germany, and about being uprooted from her homeland. Noether was still a caring and compassionate teacher. She kept up her charismatic teaching style, often lapsing into German if she was having trouble getting her ideas across to the students. Noether's death in 1935 surprised nearly everyone, as she had told only her closest friends of her illness.

Emmy Noether made many contributions to the field of mathematics. She spent her time studying abstract algebra, with special attention to rings, groups, and fields. Because of her unique look on topics, she was able to see relationships that traditional algebra experts could not. She published over 40 papers in her lifetime. She was also a teacher that was able to inspire her students to make their own contributions to the field of mathematics.

April, 1995

References
Noether, Gottfried. "Emmy Noether," in Women of Mathematics, A Biobibliographic Sourcebook, Louise Grinstein and Paul Campbell, Editors, Greenwood Press, 1987.
Noether, Emiliana Pasca. "Emmy Noether," in Complexities: Women in Mathematics, Bettye Anne Case and Anne Leggett, Editors, Princeton University Press (2005), 30-37.
Morrow, James. "Emmy Noether," in Notable Women in Mathematics: A Biographical Dictionary, Charlene Morrow and Teri Perl, Editors, Greenwood Press (1998), 152-157.
Olsen, Lynn M. Women in Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1974.
Perl, Teri. Women in Mathematics, Lives of Women Mathematicians, plus Discovery Activities, World Wide Publishing, 1993.
Slachman, Virginia. Portraits for Classroom Bulletin Boards - Woman Mathematicians, Dale Seymour Publications, 1990.
Profile in the "Emmy Noether Lectures," Association for Women in Mathematics.
Kimberling, C. "Emmy Noether," American Math. Monthly 79 (1972), 136-149.
Kimberling, C. "Emmy Noether and her influence," in Emmy Noether: A Tribute to her Life and Work, James W. Brewer and Martha K. Smith, Editors, M. Dekker, New York, 1981.
Kimberling, C. "Emmy Noether, Greatest Woman Mathematician," Mathematics Teacher 84 no. 3 (March 1982), 246-249. (Available at the Houghton Mifflin web site http://www.matharticles.com under section 10.1 in the drop down menus.)
Srinivasan B. and J. Sally. Emmy Noether in Bryn Mawr: Proceedings of a Symposium, Springer-Verlag, 1983.
Dick, Auguste. Emmy Noether, 1882-1935, translated by H.I. Blocher, Birkhäuser, 1981.
Dictionary of Scientific Biography
Van der Waerden, B. L. "The school of Hilbert and Emmy Noether," Bull. London Math. Soc. 15(1)(1983), 1-7.
Weyl, H. "Emmy Noether," Scripta Mathematica, 3(1935), 201-220.
Emmy Noether, mathematician, Clark Kimberling's web site contains a list of publications about Emmy Noether.
Noether's Novelty, John Derbyshire, National Review Online, April 21, 2005.
MathSciNet [subscription required]
Mathematics Genealogy Project
Biography at the MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive.
Photo Credit: Photograph used with the permission of Professor Emiliana P. Noether



Artfldgr says:

and just to set the record straight in the article... "In 1933, Hitler and the Nazis came into power in Germany. "

they didnt just 'come' to power... note in the story that they pointed out that after ww1 the state became a republic, just like the USA... however, women got the vote, and rather than accept a world less safe, they accepted hitlers platform of a safe world that would work for the children.

in the east (germany) they put hitler in power.. care to check out who they sided in the west? not much differnt... women seem to want totalitarianism, and to be under the heel... which sucks... for when they turn against the husbands and family, they then marry the state, and they get Huxleys heel.

Socialism says that we all live for the state, and before socialism, women lived for themselves and their families, NOT THE STATE...

the women have even now taken up hitlers advice. since it was the same message that they both used to get the women to vote socialism in!

"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. as long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation." - Adolf

and marx said.

"Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included." -- Karl Marx
.


his daugter said

"Women are the creatures of an organized tyranny of men, as the workers are the creatures of an organized tyranny of idlers." -- Eleanor Marx, The Woman Question

do note that neither lived under the politics they espoused.. they both sat comfortably in free states, whiel their ideas killed 100 million and more people.

"For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him." -- Karl Marx


so it was women in each state that gasve them the vote, that created either socialism (state owns everything and a few people control it all), or fascism (state controls everything and a few people run the means of production for the state - taxes used to control the rest)... we havent had capitalism in the US since the 1800s

[they loved FDR too... the man who made the depression last longer... nearly created a communist controled economy, and lots more]

this is why every commnunist movement writes works that try to answer the "womens question"...


women are more gullible than men (except when it comes to women). women are the ones that the whole advertising industry plays to.. as they can spend the money of others, and they do it now with less care...

well, same thign with ideology... do note how many feminist icons are really ugly washed up ladies in which a husband marraige system would never work for them.

so rather than find something that would work for the few... they destroyed what the many had. no more holidays... traditions... no family around when your a grandmother that you can take care of... no decent men aroudn as they dont mature when there is no reason to... subsistence level of existence, so there is no travel, and fun.. nothing but work... and for whom? the state... as she works to pay for the daycare, and the state takes the rest in taxes... so rather than work for her own kids, she works for the state... and then helps the state by paying someone of less capacity to mistreat her kids while she is away, and the state dont have to pay welfare..

if you analyse the whole thing... it behooves the state, hurts teh common man, woman and family, destroys kids and makes them orphans even if its just emotional, adn provides a huge cadre of sex toys and broken people for entertainment and use (abuse).

it was much harder for politicians, and the elite to find a bevy of women to be perverted with... but now, they can find them everywhere... and there is easy asccess as the famuly protects no one now... and so on.


maybe some day women will take a step back and stop dreaming of what they think they are making and start seeing what they are actually creating, and for whom.

but they are too vain, and vanity will keep them from this realization beacuse it would put them in a bad light, and women have this idealism that there are no bad women (except because of men), and then they will have in america what russia has, and what china has, and venezuella will have soon.


they think they can keep doing this to their mates... and disinfranchise the very people that actyually care for them and are close to them... in favor of a non entity that steals from them and says nice things about them, and pretends to be the big daddy to punuish those that go against them.

the birth rates here are dead... all over the west...

care to check out the numbers of the people that are against things?

in africa, the natives over ran the british with spears.

the united states and the west cant field an army that can stand up against the chinese and the russians.

even though russia doesnt have as much equipment, they have a lot more people that they can dispose of and a history of doing so.


i would advise reading up on the history that they wrote out... and stop believing things because they say the lies that you want to hear.

like the song says... and the fact that it was a hit confirms.

"tell me lies tell me sweet little lies..."

women like little lies over truths...

tell her she is pretty, tell her she is empowered (by being a sex toy, or killing her own progeny)..

tell them anything... and as long as you wrap it in a lie, they will swallow it beacuse they like the lie more than they like reality.

while that might not be all women (though everyone i have met has this to some degree... any look in their wardrobe closet and draws will tell you that), not all of them are so blind and willing to be lied to.

they are not in the majority though.

proof is in blaming men for advertising that appeals to them... the images they see on the runway are images of gay pretty boys not images of women that men like...top models are masculine... and top writers of shows they copy behavior from are gay too...

check out sluts in the city parody of sex in the city to get it... they were rewrapping womens empowerment through indiscriminate sex acts as evidence of that independence.

and women ate it up... an then went out and told all the men what they were about by ordering "cosmos".

strap a carrot to a thin woman, that other women look up, and they will follow her over a cliff...

dont believe me? then why follow dworkin, and the others?

oh yeah... because they all told you to follow the other ones... number 1 said to listen and follow number 2,3,4,5... and number two said to follow 1,3,4,5, etc.

and so women think that their leaders are leaders because they are with merit... but they arent... women arent tracking the results against promises... ergo 40 years of misery resulting in loss of freedom, fertility, and family, perhaps that situation permanently.

they patted each other on the back, and made deals with the likes of big tobacco and sold women out for personal power.

and women eat it up...

which is why they are winning....

when they win, we will have a socialist state. (soviet communist)

just as they won in germany and made a socialist state. (national socialist).

why will this happen?

because women dont seem to believe other women when they talk, and believe when they lie.. then make apologetics for their 'friends'


dont believe me, then why do women follow these women, women who are the top and make policy for women in politics?

"Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism." -- Catharine A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, (First Harvard University Press, 1989), p. 10


"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." -- Catharine MacKinnon

"[I]f even 10 percent of American women remain full-time homemakers, this will reinforce traditional views of what women ought to do and encourage other women to become full-time homemakers at least while their children are young.... This means that no matter how any individual feminist might feel about child care and housework, the movement as a whole [has] reasons to discourage full-time homemaking." -- Jane J. Mansbridge, Why We Lost the ERA, p.100

"The care of children ..is infinitely better left to the best trained practitioners of both sexes who have chosen it as a vocation...[This] would further undermine family structure while contributing to the freedom of women." -- Kate Millet, Sexual Politics, 178-179


"Millett argued that the complete destruction of marriage and the natural family is necessary to produce an ideal society."11 -- Patrick F. Fagan, Robert E. Rector, and Lauren R. Noyes, Why Congress Should Ignore Radical Feminist Opposition to Marriage

"We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage." -- Robin Morgan (ed), Sisterhood is Powerful, 1970, p.537

"The Women's Caucus [endorses] marxist-leninist socialist thought." -- Robin Morgan, Sisterhood is Powerful, p.597

"The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist." -- (National NOW Times, Jan. 1988)

"Women have no sympathy... And my experience of women is almost as large as Europe. And it is so intimate too. Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving you any in return for they cannot remember your affairs long enough to do so." -- Florence Nightingale

"Not merely about equal rights for women ... Feminism aspires to be much more than this. It bids to be a totalizing scheme resting on a grand theory, one that is as all-inclusive as Marxism, as assured of its ability to unmask hidden meanings as Freudian psychology, and as fervent in its condemnation of apostates as evangelical fundamentalism. Feminist theory provides a doctrine of original sin: The world’s evil’s originate in male supremacy." -- Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies, p.183 (***Note: Patai & Koertge write from a critical perspective of where feminism has been going and use the above in the context of an example to illustrate their case. See Daphne Patai's website here: http://www.daphnepatai.com/ And read about her work here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daphne_Patai )


"The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together. ... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. ... "Families have supported oppression by separating people into small, isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common interests." -- Functions of the Family, Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall 1969

"Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that" -- Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, "The Daily Illini," April 25, 1981

"If women are to effect a significant amelioration in their condition it seems obvious that they must refuse to marry." -- Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971), p. 317

[and notice that more women and children are now in poverty and such than ever before... why? because family is a team effort, and through all these quotes, there is nothign so vain and selfish as woman. or can you point to something else that someone would deny the act of their own creation from their own, so that they could play their life away.. and for who? not themselves, as the state takes it all in socialism... so they will not work for themsevles, they will work for the leaders...

have you noticed that the soviet states leadership is devoid of women in any numbers? that a sociopathic state like that sees women as they describe free staes to see them? and that by doing this, they get them to run for the jail happy?

"Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains." -- Herbert Hoover


"[The nuclear family is] a cornerstone of woman's oppression: it enforces women's dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation." -- Alison Jaggar, Feminist Politics and Human Nature


yeah... and it enables birth... somethign homosexuality does not do... nor does nihilism... nor does selfishness... etc.

the freedom they have to try to be somethign they deny their own progeny. that by doing what they do, they deny the future and any part they will have in it long term.

"We can't expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism." -- Nikita Kruschev

and women have been bringing those doses in.


feminists like gun control... right?

we understood that the old German tradition of citizens' owning guns had to end. On March 18, 1938, we enacted our Law on Weapons and ruled that only government agents may own firearms. You can imagine my approval as I watched Senator Thomas Dodd craft America's Gun Control Act of 1968 by having our own law of 1938 translated for him by an official of the Library of Congress. My dear Julius, we can be proud of how similarly the two laws read. Those gun control efforts are naive and well-meaning, but their results will resemble ours. We told the German people that gun control laws were needed to curb gang activity and preserve democracy, but what those laws did was help us prevail.

"We must declare openly what is concealed, namely, the political function of the school...It is to construct communist society." -- V.I. Lenin

they like public schools... right? it lets them put their childrens minds in the hands of other people all day, while they are free to persue what they want and then wonder why their kids are doing so bad.

from adolf hitler by rabbi lapin
"We Nazis understood that every German citizen must live for the state. And in the same way that wise farmers accept responsibility for the health of their herds, we used the power of government to keep our flocks healthy. We were disgusted by the addictive powers of cigarettes, since both mind and body were supposed to belong to the Führer. We succeeded in almost criminalizing the smoking of cigarettes. "

basically, they realized that it was women that made the change from republic to socialist state..

so they just did the same... and they will hit us economically by dumping the currency, and the women will howl for the state to save them, and in great numbers will vote a woman in that will change the state to a completely socialist one to meet thos needs.

from then on.. the men will be too moribund to change thigns... like in russia.. and elsewhere.


however it looks like this time, it will be an immigrant invasion similar to rome...

check out how many feminists, are now turning to islam!!! (they see the strength and they side with it... as they saw the strength in hitler, and sided with it)

sad vary sad that women listen to women BLINDLY... (and thats been shown in many empirical studies)...

this makes them vulnerable to a group of women who want power, and dont care about them..

[how else could you link and collect power in both sides of oppositions? duh]




Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/549