Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Assassination as Politics: Worse than the Disease?

Filed under: Philosphy

How should Western governments view assassination as a political tool?
Off the table
Only in extreme emergency
Standard option
  
pollcode.com free polls

We welcome submissions from readers and are happy to grant anonymity upon request. An anonymous contributor who would like to be known as Diplomacy Dan submits the following commentary to Publius Pundit:

In August 2006 Publius Pundit posted about world crazies or "leaders" who should be eliminated because they are so dangerous. It quoted the late Jean Francois Revel's How Democracies Perish on two observations: First, that "democracy is zealous is devising arguments to prove the justice of its adversary's case and to lengthen the already overwhelming list of its own inadequacies" and, second, that "it is a mistake to ascribe democratic logic to a totalitarian system." The West often does exactly what Revel describes: it proves the justice of the adversary's case (think, for example, Guantanamo) and ascribe democratic logic to totalitarian systems (Iran, Russia, Cuba, as a start).

Unfortunately none of the people nominated has been removed, several are even worse than before and only one "resigned." But now we have the contribution of two young economists to suggest that assassination of tyrants does help. Benjamin Jones and Benjamin Olken studied the effects of assassinations and, in a May 2007 paper, found:

Assassinations of autocrats produce substantial changes in the country's institutions, while assassinations of democrats do not. In particular, transitions to democracy, as measured using the Polity IV dataset (Marshall and Jaggers 2004), are 13 percentage points more likely following the assassination of an autocrat than following a failed attempt on an autocrat. Similarly, using data on leadership transitions from the Archigos dataset (Goemans et al., 2006), we find that the probability that subsequent leadership transitions occur through institutional means is 19 percentage points higher following the assassination of an autocrat than following the failed assassination of an autocrat. The effects on institutions extend over significant periods, with evidence that the impacts are sustained at least 10 years later.

Read the paper to get the details, including that, unfortunately, seventy-five percent of assassination attempts fail!

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


wow says:

kim,

i do hope you understand that this blog is increasingly becoming a half-rate imitation of all of the kremlin's most outrageous propaganda.

openly advocating the assasination of all leaders that disagree with the us is about as imperliastic as it gets.

have a problem with another country? easy, pay someone to gun down their entire leadership. that's liberal democracy in action for ya!


La Russophobe says:

Becoming? Try to read a little, you dolt. This post is referencing a post from this blog published MORE THAN A YEAR AGO.

What's more, it's a POLL that ASKS what readers think.

I hope you realize that you're a total moron who's just made a gigantic fool of himself.


sorry says:

sorry kim, i should have said

'this site has for a long time been the den of crazed wackos who think that the united states should pursue a broad policy of assasination'

my apologies for getting the date wrong, but i think that's both forgivable (why did you post the stupid thing again? ego feeling a little down today?) and substantially less 'foolish' than advocating a world-wide policy of murder.


vova says:

Kim,

On behalf of your readers I apologize for the offensive and idiotic remarks posted here. Now to the point:

Of course I am all for assassinations, provided we assassinate the right people at the right time and in a right place. But consider a hypothetical: We send a crack special forces team in 1933 to Germany to assassinate Hitler... and get Ernest Röhm, who wasn't dispatched until 1934. We can only speculate that Ernest Röhm with his Sturmabteilungen-SA could have been even worse.

A warning to the leftists: do not read this.
Here's another scenario: Our crack team goes to Russia and assassinates Lenin in 1922. And what do we get? Trotsky, who would have been much worse than Stalin. Or Stalin but two years sooner, also not a good outcome.

Having said this, I am still emphatically for.


hahaha says:

Our favorite little village fascist Kim Zigfeld strikes again! Look out posts that Kim doesn't agree with, you'll be assassinated too!






Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/694