Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Exposing Chinese Barbarism

Filed under: Asia

14fmreview14550.jpg

The New Yorker's review of the 2006 film Blind Mountain, currently in theaters:

The writer-director Li Yang's stunningly realistic drama, a furious denunciation of injustices in contemporary China, is designed to elicit from viewers a primal cry of anger. Bai (Huang Lu), a young woman who has recently graduated from a big-city university, is hired as a saleswoman of herbal medicines and accompanies her boss and a colleague on a business trip to an isolated, mountainous rural village. There, they drug her, steal her I.D., and vanish, having sold her to a local peasant to be his wife. Confined, beaten, chained, and raped, she is still unwilling to submit to her fate, but her every effort to escape is thwarted by a society of permanent surveillance. Li reveals corruption at every level of Chinese society, including the urban nouveaux riches who sold Bai; the police, who demand payment for an investigation; and an E.R. doctor who won't perform lifesaving first aid without cash in hand. As if to prove who's to blame, the new outfit that Bai's captors bring her is bright red, just like the armbands of Party officials and the flags that greet them. As Bai peers out from her domestic prison at the majestic mountain vistas, they look like a wasteland of barbaric ignorance and official oppression. In Mandarin.

See it. Then think about the massacre in Tibet on Saturday. The Dalai Lama calls it "cultural genocide." Should the civilized world attend the China Olympics? Boycott? Or should it go just to protest? We'd like your opinion.

Should civilized countries boycott the Olympics when held in places like Russia and China?
  
pollcode.com free polls

The latest development is that the Chinese government is blocking CNN, the BBC and YouTube access on the Chinese Internet in order to seal out reporting on the massacre in Tibet. So much for the idea that the mighty Internet can overcome totalitarian repression. Brick and mortar repression will always require a brick and mortar response.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


vova says:

Good piece. But fails to convince the likes of Jacques Rogge or Yahoo or Google management, and that's a shame


Jeha says:

There is an opportunity for freedom in China this year, if properly "leveraged" and covered, protests such the ones in Tibet can really have an impact.

For one, we are going towards the Beijing Olympic, so human rights and the environment can be huge levers in this context. Tibet is a huge sore spot. But there are others; someone downstream on the Mekong could also make a little bit more noise, and the Three Gorges issue may get more unwelcome light.

For another, we're in the middle of a hotly contested US election. Tibetans, thanks to their "virtual" buddhist diaspora, can do a lot more to force some real debate on the issue. Corner the candidates in taking a more "tangible" position, if you will.


Lomo says:

Amazing that Bush took China off of its "worst human rights offenders" list just a couple of days before the brutal massacre in Tibet. Reporters Without Borders, Amnesty and others slammed the move. Hopefully Bush will get a pair and put China back on the black list after this genocidal massacre.


vova says:

Lomo,
Never stop being amazed by Bush. He will sell out Ukraine and Georgia and Israel and what not to appease the malignant little troll and the lunatic fringe of the Democrat party and fascistoid media, lest he be accused of being a warmongering race-bating reactionary.
This is sad. This is why you should vote for American Hero Capt. John McCain.


vova says:

Pubic hair,
"Do I have to write about it on PP to expose the USA barbarism?" Well, you just did!
Are you by any chance member of chocolate Hitler's racist Nazi "church?" There is a vacancy there for a bile-spewing race-bating America-hating islamo-christian preacher.
I do not speak for Kim but personally I am grateful to you native American teaching us dumb Eastern European immigrants about the hard left value system.


Jauhara says:

In America, EP, we expect our laws and law enforcement to be the great equalizer of us all. In China, and indeed, in tyrannies like China, whether Communist or Islamic or Zimbabwean, you must bribe everyone for a snippet of justice...and furthermore, there is a shortage of women in China...thanks to the one child per family policy...which is ruthlessly enforced.


vova says:

Pubic,
This post is called "Exposing Chinese Barbarism." Civil disobidience and armed struggle are a ligitimate tool against an oppressive terrorist state.
You don't write comments, you just bitch and complain.
I feel sorry for you. Why do you love tyrants and hate America so much?


Lomo says:

vova,
I'm not sure I follow you. Bush upgraded China on the human rights abusers' list because of the Democrat party and the fascist American media? I thought he did it because he and every politician is a slave to business interests, and America is getting so weak compared to China that it is afraid of upsetting China. You're right that he's also afraid of Putin and is selling out Ukraine and Georgia. It's depressing to watch my country slide into irrelefance and have to bend to nefarious interests rather than standing for something. About McCain, has he come out for taking a hard stand against China over Tibet? Have Clinton or Obama? It will be interesting to see if any of them has a real moral compass.


vova says:

Lomo,
I agree that business interests and China's rising economic and military strength are very much the driver, but you can at least pay lip service to freedom and democracy, denounce human rights abuses, and... continue trading. We do acknowledge Saudis' appaling human rights record--sort of--and continue our close cooperation. Frankly, I don't know what is worse--denounce China while continuing trade relations or turn the blind eye while continuing trade relations, because severing them would be ruinous to our own economy.
As for the candidates, Obama is s communofascist, so you don't expect much of this chocolate Hitler, Billary is up to her snatch in Chicom money. You'd expect more from a former POW with a deeply ingrained sense of right and wrong and good practical (empirical) knowledge of Asian communism.


Lomo says:

Vova,
A "chocolate Hitler"? I hope this site isn't another freakish white power site. I thought it was about promoting democracy. Is it? I like McCain too, probably will vote for him. But to abuse Obama as a "chocolate hitler" is sickening, as is your misogynist attack on Clinton's "snatch."
Goodbye to this site for me, hope you weirdos enjoy your racist hate.


vova says:

Lomo, you are hypersensitive.
America's No. 1 coon, Ray Nagin, introduced the word "chocolate" as a racial designation. Why can't I? He also says that New Orleans is a "vagina-fiendly city." Hussein is O. is a biracial middle-class Kenyan-Kansan Hawaiian-born Indonesian-raised Columbia and Harvard graduate who chose to immerse himself in the most corrosive and paranoid end of a racial-grievance ghetto mentality that is nothing to do with him, his family or his upbringing.
As to Hillary's snatch, what's wrong with it? Actually, something must be--because Bill wouldn't have any of it, preferring instead Monica's oral orifice in the oval office.


vova says:

Pubic,

I got the gist of your argument:

Civil disobedience and armed struggle are OK when directed against democracies and regimes that are friendly to America.

Civil disobedience and armed struggle are NOT OK when directed against dictatorship, illegitimate states, and regimes that are America's enemies.

Makes sense, at least to the rabid chocolate preacher from Hussein Obama's "church."


Hu says:

China has shortage of young woman for bride. If rich peasant pay to kidnap woman for wife, this is only necessary. Practical solution to practical problem, nay?


wowpanda says:

Here is an unbiased report on Tibet:
http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html

It is rather amazing how real truth can be hard to digest ....

So when researching, true materials first and leave fictions to Hollywood. Always base your actions on facts, not emotions.


Peejay says:

I enjoyed reading the comments posted here.
I have several Chinese friends here in the US, and they all have family and friends back in China. We pray for them always.

I think something needs to be done about the human rights issues in China. There is an interesting debate forming about this here:

http://www.riledup.com/debate/1645/should-everyone-boycott-the-olympics-in-china







Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/705