Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Kozlovsky 1, Putin 0

Filed under: Russia

The Kremlin can be beaten.

Novaya Gazeta reports that 23-year-old Oleg Kozlovsky has won his battle against Vladimir Putin's Kremlin after it attempted to illegally draft him on December 20, 2007, into the Russian army in order to silence his political activism. On March 4th he returned home to Moscow from the military base in Ryazan (to which he had been quickly spirited and held in communcido) and the next day appeared at the local enlistment office (as shown above) where he officially received demobilization status as a reserve. The Russian paper notes that Kozlovsky's release occurs immediately after the conclusion of the presidential election even though the official decision in his case was made on January 29th in response to his vigorous legal attack. The website of Kozlovsky's political organization, Oborona, came under cyber attack in the election run-up and is still inaccessible, forcing Oborona to establish a new web presence, which includes links to a video interview (Russian transcript) of Kozlovsky by the New Times magazine and an audio interview by Echo of Moscow radio (for those who speak Russian). Kozlovsky relates how he was continually monitored and followed throughout his military internment in Ryazan, as if he were a convicted criminal, and he gave assurances that he will in no way curtain is political activity. Instead, he stated that he has concluded from the Kremlin's actions that such activity is even more necessary. He plans to file suit against the local military enlistment office for its illegal actions against him and to seek the dismissal of the ranking officer there as well as financial compensation.

As we've previously reported, sending Kozlovsky into the army was illegal for three reasons: First because he was classified as a reserve officer and had been drafted as an ordinary conscript, second because he was engaged in an approved course of higher education and third because he had a recognized medical disability.

The Moscow Times reports he declared: "It's the old Soviet tactics at work. The problem with that, as ever, is that there is no proof of FSB involvement." He was told by various military personnel that the FSB was guiding the illegal attack, and would like to take action against the FSB as well if proof could be obtained.

Will the Kremlin accept this defeat? Or will it pursue the Politkovskaya solution? Only time will tell. The world must now rally to Kozlovsky's aid, as only massive international support can maximize his chances against the malignant forces of the Kremlin. Had not publicity instigated by this blog raised his profile and resulted in several major stories in the MSM, he might still be languishing in the neo-Soviet gulag -- or worse. We cannot expect the Kremlin to simply let him enjoy his victory.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


nice kim says:

"Had not publicity instigated by this blog raised his profile and resulted in several major stories in the MSM"

Is this English, or gibberish? You posted a story making fun of the Russians for messing up a translation of "plain vanilla" but that, at least, was idiom; your "writing" here is what I would expect in a 2nd grade essay composition, not a blog claiming credit for defeating the Kremlin.


La Russophobe says:

As we've previously reported, the Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Guardian and Economist all reported on Kozlovsky specifically because of much earlier stories here, on La Russophobe, and most of all in Pajamas Media.

Sorry if the truth hurts you little maggot. If you don't care for it, don't read this blog.


Vova says:

Publicity helped but what helped him more was that Kozlovskiy was not a serious threat. As soon as the march and the March 2 action were over they let him go.
Not so with Maksim Reznik. He is perceived as a threat, hence the remand.
Btw, incommunicado is one word, not two, imho


kida says:

"incommunicado is one word, not two, imho"

Whether it's one word or two is not a matter of opinion (the 'o' in 'imho'), it's a matter of fact. It is, in fact, one word. If you're not sure, say "I think" not "in my opinion".


Vova says:

Kida, you don't harbor any anti-immigrant sentiments, do you? Just kidding.
Of course I know how to spell it. I just don't want the blog host to call me names. I am just being oh-so politically correct. Besides, Kim and I are partners in crime.


La Russophobe says:

VOVA:

I'd love to believe that the Kremlin sees Yabloko as a threat, but I can't make myself. There's little in Russia so pathetically lame as Yaboloko. Maybe this guy's an exception, but I haven't seen the evidence yet.

And if Kozlovsky isn't one, then why hold him so far in advance of the elections and why so far from Moscow? Why jam his website? I think he was headed for dedovshchina but for the WaPo coverage.


Vova says:

Kim,
No, Kremlin doesn't think Yabloko is any more of a threat than, say, Ralphie Nader is here. Yavlinskiy is a smart guy but he is truly pathetic and would never cross his handlers "behind the wall."
But there is an intra-party struggle in Yabloko. This should be seen against the backdrop of the inter-party struggle and the realization that the "established" center-right and center-left Liberal parties have outlived their usefulness and have no appeal.
So attempts at sorting things out, discarding SPS and Yabloko, and starting from scratch with fresh faces worry Surkov and the Putvedev team. The founding congress of the democrating movement scheduled for 6 April is St. Petersburg worries them, and Maksim Reznik is (or was) the driving force behind the democratic unity movement. So his arrest is unrelated to the dissenters march or even Yabloko itself--it is his attempt to dump Yavlinskiy and form a credible opposition force. Together with Ilya Yashin, Reznik could become more than a speedbump


La Russophobe says:

You haven't pointed, you apelike cretin, to a single story in the English media in a forum larger than my blogs which predated them. The story in the Economist ran first, at my personal urging and followed my reporting, and the others followed it LONG afterwards.

To be sure, all Western reporting was based on initial reporting from obscure Russian sources -- but those sources are no more capable of protecting Russian dissidents from the Kremlin's barbaric persecution than they are of walking on the moon. Mr. Kozlovsky himself has personally thanked me for my efforts.

Your suggestion that the "world" knew about Kozlovsky before he appeared on my blogs is the statement of an utter imbecile, a person tripping out on narcotics, a neo-Soviet thug. Your antics would be amusing if they were not so pathetic and indicative of a country hurtling into oblivion.

Sorry if the truth hurts you so much. If you can't handle it, don't read this blog.


Vova says:

Kim, your previous post wasn't addressed to me, was it?
I took Kozlovskiy's plight close to heart just as I did Larisa Arap's--for a personal reason. And I am happy pressure--including the blogs such as yours--helped.
Having said this we must admit that as good and important the job Kozlovskiy does, on the political scale his is a street fighter (and they in the end may, just may, nudge the syndicate from its current entrenched position) and is no match to the political and organizational skill of Maksim Reznik. I have it on good authority (can't say more here) that by taking him out of play the malignant little troll's syndicate took the winds out of the upcoming opposition unity congress' sails. Hense the harsh punishment.
The regime (still) can take the heat of stinging criticism but it is very allergic to any credible attempts to organize, as evidenced by Reznik's detention, or to offer a concrtete action plan, as Illarionov did.
Btw, Dmitriy Oreshkin said today that there was no longer a peaceful legal way of regime change, and he's not the only one to understand that.
Both Yabloko, and to a letter extent SPS, are Kremlin's lapdog opposition. Emergence of people like Reznik and Yashin is therefore seen as a threat, especially knoowing that there are capable yound politicians with popular appeal available to take over in a flash--Milov and Ryzhkov to name just a few.
Tip of the day: Viktor But. Follow the money. Qui bono?


La Russophobe says:

No, it was addressed to Mr. "Puberty" who is so loathsome that his "name" is not worth mentioning.


Vova says:

Mentally and emotionally he is prepubescent...
Take a look at this: http://zaxi.livejournal.com/77086.html
Ivan Safronov, Kommersantъ reporter who was suicided by defenestration last year, was on But's trail


La Russophobe says:

Scary stuff. And who knows what tomorrow will bring.

As for the retard, I must say though I do appreciate the repeated opportunities this idiot gives me to both (a) hype my blogs and (b) make Russophile fools look even more ridiculous.


Vova says:

Kim, to paraphrase an old adage (and repeat your remark), if he is so smart, why doesn't he have his own blog? You should have thicker skin, though.
Well, neither Borodin, nor Adamov, nor Mogilevich ended up in U.S. custody, and these not so gentle men did have a story to tell about the malignant little troll's money trail. When Adamov was in custody, Zhirik suggested that the Russians send a team to Switzerland to assassinate him lest he spills the beans...
I am really worried about Mr. Bout's wellbeing... There is a feeling in the community that our people will flinch again and let Bout be extradited to Russia. His revelations may be too damaging and too politically incorrect for Bush, Condi, and their wimps to swallow


Vova says:

Entering, you are entertained? Then send money. To the best of my knowledge, Kim stopped providing free entertainment since entering puberty...
If she's such a дура, why do you keep torturing yourself and reading her blog?






Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/686