Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Russia Destroys Its Children

Filed under: Russia

hustler1.jpgOf all the criticisms that can be made of Vladimir Putin's Russia, by far the most damning is its failure to carry out the basic biological function of population replacement.

Far more Russians pass from the earth each year than are born (for this reason, Russia has a horrifying net loss of population each year, in the hundreds of thousands, even though it has a huge amount of immigration as unwelcome Russians return home from far-flung parts of the former USSR). Only 21 countries in the whole world have a higher mortality rate than Russia, and its rate of 16/1,000 is double that of the United States. The mortality rate has risen steadily through Putin's years in power (it is up nearly 15% since 2003), and the only thing Putin has been able to think of to deal with that reality is to bribe Russian parents to have more children. This classic Russian "solution" is actually worse than the existing problem. People don't want children, but they do want money. So they take the money, have the child -- and then what happens? That child will be lucky to live to see his 18th birthday, and if he does he'll certainly be impacted by the fact that the only reason he exists is because his parents got paid. Meanwhile, nothing is done about Russia's alarming mortality rate, which sees the average Russian man fail to reach his sixtieth year of life. From AIDS to smoking to house fires, Russia's population is being wiped out by every scourge and disease imaginable, while the Kremlin ignores the problem and spends its cash buzzing America and Britain with strategic bombers and sending weaponry to the likes of Venezuela, Syria and Iran.

Here are just a few of the horrifying details:

  • 2 out of every 5 Russian children are victims of family violence
  • 50,000 Russian children flee their homes each year
  • 11,000 Russian children are currently imprisoned
  • last year alone, 2,000 Russian children were murdered by their parents
  • 4.5 million Russian children live in single-parent homes without child support
  • One Russian woman is murdered by her husband every 40 minutes
  • Russia and Belarus lead the world in divorces
  • One Russian commits suicide every ten minutes
  • Russia has the fifth-highest murder rate on the planet

Russia's divorce rate is one-third greater than the U.S. Its suicide rate is four times higher than that of the America's, and its child and spousal murder rates are ten times higher.

In a recent op-ed column in the Moscow Times, the brilliant Russian commentator Georgy Bovt, who hosts a program on Moscow's City-FM radio station, told the paper's readers more about this ongoing atrocity against Russia's children.

Bovt noticed that while incidents of violence against Russian children by American adoptive parents, which are the rare exception to the general rule, get massive airtime on anti-American, state-owned Russian television whenever they occur, the Kremlin totally ignores the outrageous conduct of Russians themselves. And this doesn't apply only to state-controlled media. When has "president" Putin ever given a speech demanding that Russians take better care of their children?

Bovt writes:

If we are so concerned about the fate of Russian children adopted by foreigners, why do we remain silent about the children adopted by Russians? There are no statistics available on domestic abuse cases of adopted children. We know only that 2,500 Russian children die at their parents' hands every year, according to Interior Ministry statistics. We don't know how many of those children were adopted because the country has no system for monitoring the progress of adopted children. But we do know that 1 million adoptive parents were deprived of their adoption rights because of child abuse. Another 2,500 families changed their minds and sent the children they had adopted back to the orphanages.

The answer to the question he asks, of course, is simple: Russian's aren't "so concerned." In fact, they're not concerned at all. What motivates them is not love for their children, but hatred for America. Bovt writes:

Russian laws governing adoptions by foreigners have gotten stricter in recent years. Even accredited adoption agencies are finding it difficult to manage -- primarily because of the pervasive corruption among bureaucrats. Only in the last two years has the number of Russians adopting children -- 7,000 -- exceeded that of foreigners adopting Russian children -- 6,000.

So foreigners care more about Russia's children, and adopt more of them, than Russians themselves. And now, by imposing restrictions on that process, Russia is actually choking off that care, condemning its parentless children to lives of brutal isolation. In Russians' view these children are garbage, but still too good to give to filth-ridden Americans.

That's barbarism, pure and simple. Only such an attitude could explain why Russia loses up to one million people from its population every year as all manner of disease and pestilence ravage the nation. The average Russian man doesn't live to see his sixtieth year, placing Russia outside the world's top 100 nations in that category. Russia is, indeed, barbaric as a matter of statistics.

And it doesn't care. As Bovt points out, it doesn't even try to keep -- much less publish -- basic records regarding its performance, and even if it was doing so such data could not be taken seriously. Russians have chosen to be ruled by a proud KGB spy whose words are no more trustworthy than astrology. Bovt's column itself is victimized by a failure to fully recognize this lack of reliability: When he states "we do know that 1 million adoptive parents were deprived of their adoption rights because of child abuse" he forgets to insert they key phrase "at least" to signal that this Russian data cannot be considered reliable and could well be a gross understatement -- owing not merely to Kremlin dishonesty but also to Russia's general tradition of bureaucratic corruption and incompetence.

Russia scholar Paul Goble has more details about the horror of Russian atrocities against children and the pathetic efforts of the government to protect them. His post is the source for the first five of the bullet points above.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


misha says:

Am I detecting just a little bit of baby envy in your tone?


Saul Wall says:

I wonder if Russia will:

A) Pull itself together while its leaders are busy with their own agenda.
B) Become colonized by Chinese seeking a land where there is no "overt" communism and no "one child policy"
C) Become a wilderness preserve with a few cities and towns.


vova says:

Save the children! Destroy Russia!

On second thought, they are doing a good job destroying themselves.


misha says:

the Kremlin [is sending] weaponry to the likes of Venezuela, Syria and Iran..."

They are cash-paying customers, and a percentage of all Russian weapons profits are donated to the Save the Children fund. Besides that such weapons shipments are one of the few ways that Russia has at its disposal to counter American imperialism, such as the recent theft of the Kosovo province of Serbia, or the NATO expansion up to Russia's doorstep in former Soviet territory.

If something irks the Americans so much then it can't be all bad, right?

Iran has applied for and might receive permission to become a full member of the SCO (Shanghai Cooperative Organization), which is basically the Russia-China version of NATO in Central Asia. Currently Iran only has "observer" status in the SCO, but she is seeking full membership.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/6951370.stm
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060824&articleId=3056
http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/235929686-russia-throws-a-wrench-in-natos-works

By the way, the US/NATO situation in Afghanistan has gotten so desperate that the US is now begging the SCO to help out there (as the SCO acts as the main bullwork against Islamic extremism in the oil rich former Soviet Central Asian states). But don't be too offended if Russia politely declines your generous offer. Russia seems to remember that it already was in Afghanistan once and you didn't much care for that. Now your asses are in the vice. What goes around comes around, as they say.

But maybe now that the French president Nicolas Sarkozy has promised extra French troops, the US will finally be able to prevail in Afghanistan (he he).


vova says:

Hey, Dude,

"When Russia is just coming out of the deepest crisis in her history."

Really? She's getting deeper and deepr in a crisis which is now up to her crotch. There is a total paralysis of power and chaos. The infrastructure is crumbling, there is no productive sector nor people who could run it. It's a raw material appendage of the industrialized world.

"The article is intentionally exaggerated.
And does not show the real social improvements in Russia"

You are right, Dude. It's exaggerated in that refers to this shithole of a cesspit, this real estate carved up by a bunch of worlords, as a country. It ain't a country.


Intelligencer says:

It really is heartbreaking to see what's happened in post-Soviet Russia. And if you think it's bad there, you should check out places like Ukraine or Moldova which aren't awash in oil. I've known Ukrainians who work six months in Russia and make enough to live the remaining months comfortably in Ukraine.

On an unrelated note -- Putin is such a bastard. It's like they say, "civilizations never jump the tracks." You can draw a straight line from the tsars, through the Soviet leaders to Putin. Plus ca chance, sadly.


Thomas says:

"Only in the last two years has the number of Russians adopting children -- 7,000 -- exceeded that of foreigners adopting Russian children -- 6,000."

"we do know that 1 million adoptive parents were deprived of their adoption rights because of child abuse"

Russians adopt 7000 children a year and yet 1 million adoptive parents were deprived of their adoption rights?

Wow how does this Math work????


Sarkozy says:

This “article” is immensely biased. Although the demographic situation in Russia is enormously dire, and must be given a primary focus on the government’s agenda, the situation is improving. Slowly? Perhaps. What is there to be done to speed up this healing process? Fanatical and grim in her determination, Kim offers virtually no suggestions.

The following statistics reflect the current reality of the Russian demographic crisis:
- In the first six months of 2007, the nation recorded 142,000 live births, with the birth rate increasing by 6.5% over the same period last year.
- The number of children born last year was the highest since 1991.
- Russia's mortality rate, one of the highest in the industrialized world, also declined by the same amount.
- The infant mortality rate stood at 10.5-11 per 1,000 last year, and now it is down to 9. The infant death rate in some regions, including St. Petersburg and Bryansk, is close to the European average of five or even three per 1,000.
- The number of recorded abortions in Moscow halved between 2000 and 2006, declining from 57,324 to 28,502.
- Russia's fertility rate climbed from 1.2 in 2000 to 1.39 in 2007. While still below the 2.1 replacement rate, it continues to show signs of improvement.
- Deaths decreased from 1,475,000 to 1,402,300. In all, the number of deaths exceeded the number of births by 1.3 times, down from 1.5 in 2006.
- Eighteen of the 83 provinces showed a natural growth of population (in 2006: 16).
- The Russian Ministry of Economic Development hopes that by 2020 the population will stabilize at 138-139 million, and by 2025, to increase again to its present day status of 143-145, raising the life expectancy to 75 years.

While it is somewhat worthwhile and ever-so-much fun to condemn Putin for not taking further steps to resolve the issue and just strutting around in his leather jacket like a Hell’s Angels’ mime, it is notable to say that the leadership of countries like Ukraine and Estonia has done an even worse job of reversing population decline. Their situation begs the question – “Could increasing financial incentives and the enrichment of a country as a whole be the only possible solution to the crisis? Or, perchance like Kim imagines it, should, Medvedev personally impregnate every fertile woman in Russia, sending the birth rate skyrocketing?” Finally, even if the worst fear come true, estimates still show Russia’s population density in 2050 will remain higher than Canada’s – which has no trouble keeping its borders and sovereignty intact. Furthermore, even with these estimations, Russia would still become Europe’s largest economy. If the population decline is reversed however, the country has a chance to become the fourth or fifth largest economy in the world.


Annie says:

In the first six months of 2007, the nation recorded 142,000 live births, with the birth rate increasing by 6.5% over the same period last year.

How many of those are in the mainly muslim areas? The rest of Russia is dying by suicide.
75% of all pregnancies in Russia are terminated.
The joy and beauty of immoral men replacing God with himself.


Sarkozy says:

Certainly, the general trend shows that areas with Islam as the religion of choice have the lower death rates and the higher birth rates. Although - Moscow’s birthrate is one of the lowest in the country, and the city is advertised to shelter two and a half million Muslims. Are suggesting that Muslims are not people?

All people with Russian citizenship receive financial incentives for producing more children – what upstart young bearded prophet chap they believe in makes no difference. Furthermore, the situation is not unique – Canada’s population growth, which for years depended on Western European immigrants, now depends on Eastern Slavs, Asians, Africans, and Arabs. Beating your fists through your chest cavity and shouting otherwise won’t alter existing realities.


Mitchell Young says:

It takes a long while to turn a supertanker, and Russia is a supertanker of a country. This is especially true of demographic factors. My own feeling is that the situation was worse under Yeltsin and his neoliberal-neoconservative 'advisers'. Russia under Putin is at least starting to regain national pride, and starting to put into effect measures to increase the birthrate.


La Russophobe says:

MITCHELL:

With all due respect to your undocumented "feelings" (and none is due), people have been saying that about Russia for more than a century now, through two regime collapses.

What will you say when Putin's goes down too? Oops, sorry about that Russians, my bad?

You conveniently ignore that, even if these problems existed under Yeltsin, other problems like the total absence of opposition media and parties in the Duma didn't. Politikovskaya wasn't killed by Yeltsin, nor was Kozlovsky sent to military internment by him. Yeltsin didn't provoke a new cold war with the overwhelmingly more powerful USA. Even if Putin had solved Russia's demographic crisis, the price would be far too high -- much as it was when the Bolsheviks "solved" the problem of Russian monarchy.

But he didn't solve it. The data that you simply choose to ignore clearly shows he's only made it worse. And we should expect nothing different even if he were inclined to try to solve the problem, rather than fight a new cold war, because he has no credentials whatsoever to try to deal with it -- and no reason to, since the craven people of Russia don't demand it.


sf says:

It will take a long time to undo the damage of communism. Large numbers of Russians remain in a state of denial. A large number of those were likely beneficiaries of the communist system.
East Germany is still on the road to recovery, despite the merger with the West. Russia will take much longer.
Only those countries which never embraced communism to begin with, such as the Czech Republic, will heal more quickly.


La Russophobe says:

ADOLESCENT:

"It does not show how the situation in Russia has improved since then. And it is improving."

So, um, let me see. We're just supposed to take your word for that, right? Because you're a world-renowned anonymous expert known as "adolescent." Um, OK.

I don't know where you got your brain, but Vladimir Putin became prime minister in 1999, so the divorce data comes after FOUR YEARS of his government being in charge and you HAVE NOT SHOWN ONE SINGLE SHRED OF DATA to show any improvement since then.

Meanwhile, you ignore data which clearly shows the mortality rate has gotten much worse during Putin's "presidency."

You also ignore the TOTAL ABSENCE of any policy initiatives by Putin to reduce divorce, or indeed even a single speech about it.

That you would dare to question the accuracy of this post based on your childish ravings is simply ludicrous and quite amusing. So, thanks for the laugh!

Meanwhile, you don't (and can't) dispute that Russia isn't in the top 100 nations of the world for mail adult lifespan and is in the top 25 nations of the world for mortality. And your response to this fact is to attempt to rationalize and excuse the lack of reform, helping things to get even worse in Russia.

So I can only ask: Why do you hate Russians so much? What did they ever do to you?


La Russophobe says:

THOMAS:

I'm aware of the point you raise, and that is why I didn't quote that statistic in my list of bullet points. I'm glad to see you've given the text such a close reading! There's lots of possible ways to explain it including a simple mistake by the author or the editor. But his point, that Russian people have always looked with great disfavor upon adoption and are inflicting egregious violence on their children is entirely valid and confirmed by many different sources.

You might also have noticed that Bovt says 2,500 children were murdered by their parents in Russia last year, while Paul Goble says the number was 2,000. For my bullet point list, I chose the more conservative figure. Oddly, none of the Russophile wackos attack me for that decision. Hmmm . . .

These points only serve to underline the point I've often tried to highlight here on this blog, namely that not only are Russians unwilling to do anything about the massive problems they face, they're not even willing to do the basic work of documenting the problem with accurate statistics. Indeed, all of the negative data reported by the Kremlin is highly questionable both because the Kremlin, run by KGB spies and because Russia's bureaucracy is so fundamentally incompetent and corrupt that it can hardly generate accurate data if it were wanted.

Can we be sure that the murder or divorce rates reported by the Kremlin are accurate? Of course not. We should assume the numbers set forth in this post are the best-case scenario for Russia, and even then they are still horrifying.


La Russophobe says:

ADOLESCENT:

Your proof that the divorce rate is getting lower is that the economy is doing better?

Sir, you're a psychopath.

Noticing that the hospital or school is more modern is not the same as noticing that your marriage is lasting longer or your children are being murdered less. Russians call this a Potemkin Village. Once again, YOU GIVE ABSOLUTELY NO DATA WHATSOEVER to indicate that child or family statistics given in this post are not accurate today.


La Russophobe says:

N. U. Voobshche:

You mean you don't care how much Russia's children are suffering and think they should be neglected as long as there is any nation on the face of the earth where children are suffering more?

How can you possibly hate Russia's children that much? What did they ever do to you?

Your Soviet propaganda tactics led to the downfall of the USSR, and they will do the same for Russia. Your hatred of the people of Russia is truly terrifying to behold.


Sasha says:

Russia is going to hell. Putin is garbage and all Russians know it, but we are trapped by the ruthless dictator! Someone please help us.


Jimmy Stevens says:

wow La Russophobe, I've seen some bad performances in debates but yours was worthy of George W. Bush. Did you snort lead paint as a kid? Did you live near powerlines? Did your parents beat you? Did you just do a lot of drugs in college (like your hero George W.) and kill most of your brain cells?

My dog, who is almost 15 years old, could have written better responses. Are you even trying anymore?


Ramin says:

ah vi suki, Misha i Vova. kak vam gnidam ne stidno pro svoyu stranu govno govorit?


Gary says:

I have been married to a Russian lady for 7 years. My wife returns for extended visits twice a year. She says that in the last two years she has seen more pregnant women than at any time in her previous 50+ years. I fully realize that is not scientific, but it is her observation as a child psychologist and educator.

I am a frequent reader of Russian editorials and news events. I want to add I have never seen anyone with the hatred La Russophobe has for everything Russian, icluding their cusaine.


Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/732