Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Annals of Rabid Russian Xenophobia

Filed under: Russia

800px-valley_of_the_geysers_A2Or7_16149.jpg

The Russian people, via Internet voting, have chosen the "seven wonders of Russia."

Well, "Russian people" is an overstatement, since the vast majority of Russians have no regular access to the Internet (and how could they, when the average salary is $4/hour while the cost of Internet access is similar to that in the West).

And wonders is a relative term, too. Most outside of Russia would never have heard of more than one or two items on the Russian list, if any, much less visited them (or even thought of doing so). Indeed, as even state-owned propaganda outfit Russia Today admits, the whole point of having the "seven wonders" voting was to convince Russians themselves, who otherwise ignore their ho-hum national treasures, to pay them more attention.

One of Russia's top seven choices, from a list of 50, was "The Valley of the Geysers" (shown above in happier times, and even then to me it looks more like a wasteland than a natural wonder, much less a tourist attraction) in the remote Siberian peninsula of Kamchatka, which would be Russia's version of America's famous Yellowstone National Park. Good luck if you want to visit. Even before last year, the place was virtually inaccessible -- meaning the vast majority of Russians had never seen it. Then last year it was totally wiped out by a massive landslide. Perhaps state-owned Russian TV forgot to mention it.

And even more good luck visiting another of the top seven, Mt. Elbrus, the Russian Everest. It's practically in Georgia and surrounded by a seething cauldron of terrorism and Russian imperialism. Wikipedia notes: "It is said to be home to the 'world's nastiest' outhouse which is close to being the highest privy in Europe. The title was conferred by Outside Magazine following a 1993 search and article. The outhouse is surrounded by and covered in ice, perched off the end of a rock, and with a pipe pouring effluvia onto the mountain."

Then there's the Motherland Statue, Russia's version of the Statute of Liberty (except that it carries a sword instead of torch, pretty apropos for Russia), located in the city formerly named after mass murderer Josef Stalin that was totally wiped out in World War II. In essence, it's a monument to the Soviet Union's "victory" over Nazi Germany. The only thing is, the Soviet government murdered millions of its own citizens, more than the Nazis, and then imploded spectacularly. An argument could be made that Russia would have been better of losing World War II (France did, and today it's a prosperous world leader).

Even if Russia had world-leading attractions that were physically accessible, that wouldn't mean foreign tourists could safely glimpse them. In its 2007 report on travel and tourism competitiveness, Booz Allen rated Russia #119 in the world out of 124 countries under review in terms of how inclined to welcome tourists the national population is (page 443).

Russia miserably failed basic criteria like whether you're likely to get out alive after your trip. Only 31 countries in the world, out of 124 reviewed, had a higher incidence of AIDS than Russia (p. 437). Only 40 countries had a higher incidence of tuberculosis (p. 439). Only 35 had a lower life expectancy (p. 440). In terms of national wonders, Russia doesn't rank in the top 50 nations of the world in share of national territory protected from development (the U.S. ranks #10 with over 25% protected; Russia is #53 with just 8%, see page 448) and it ranked #113 in terms of business concern for the ecology (p. 449).

Russia ranked #114 in terms of respecting tourist property rights (p. 313) and #106 in terms of the burdensomeness of its visa regime. It ranked #105 in terms of the reliability of police protection and #108 in terms of health and hygiene. It was #103 in terms of road infrastructure quality.

Only four governments on the planet placed lower emphasis on travel and tourism than the regime of Vladimir Putin.

So, welcome to Russia! And if you wouldn't mind too terribly much, would you please get the hell out!

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Russian Bear says:

It is not necessary for a natural wonder to be accesseble.
The monument in Volgograd is dedicated to the Battle of Stalingrad which is the most famous battle of WWII and city named after Stalin was renamed long ago, and there are numerous and magnificent monuments to victims of Communism in Russia as well.

Well, it is not a sensational news that Russia has a lot of problems. It is not a sensational news that Kim Zigfeld wrote another stupid article. It would be a sensational news if Russia had no problems or Kim Zigfeld had written something smart.


La Russophobe says:

It's "not necessary" for Bill Gates to spend any of his money, either. He could live like Bear Grylls in a house made of twigs, eating what he could catch and kill.

But it's ever so convenient!

And it's also nice if a "wonder" actually exists in the present tense. But then, Russians have always had a unique way of seeing reality. That accounts for the current status of the USSR -- and for you ignoring all that inconvenient data about social failure.


Russian Bear says:

All that 7 wonders project was just a TV game, a show.
But about your article...
Why "xenophobia" in the title?
You are Russophobic, because you are a lunatic, but Russians are not xenophobic. Yes Russia is not a comfortable place for anyone, but thousands of westerners live in Russia and do their business there and they all mark Russian friendliness, warmness and soulness.

Why Bill Gates? He is not a Russian wonder.

And it's also nice if a "wonder" actually exists in the present tense

Do "wonders" get their status posthumously?

But this of your "pearls" I like the most:

An argument could be made that Russia would have been better of losing World War II (France did, and today it's a prosperous world leader).

French people do not know yet that their prosperity they owe to occupation by Nazi Germany. Do you write in French?
Tell them that.

BTW, baby, officially France is one of the winners in WWII. She even got her occupation zone in Germany and West Berlin.


gdp says:

a few comments:

it is not true that only 12% of Russians have access to the Internet but that only 12% use it daily, there's a slight difference but God "forbid let's not get into such detail now shall we. (of course the report from Ap is no longer available)

the Valley was not "totally wiped out", the report from the BBC says that "[a] huge landslide has destroyed a large part of Russia's Valley of the Geysers, considered one of the great natural wonders of the world" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6723567.stm
Moreover it acknowledges it as a "great natural wonder" and not a "wasteland". The fact that it is allegedly "totally wiped out" does not mean that before that it had little or no value. The Seven Wonders of Ancient Times don't exist today but they were great for their time.

"Most outside of Russia would never have heard of more than one or two items on the Russian list, if any, much less visited them (or even thought of doing so" There are Americans who don't recognize the Sydney Opera House (see relevant video on youtube) but that doesn't mean it is not worth visiting.

Your argumentation on Mt. Elbrus and the Statue of the Motherland is clearly subjective in all respects and offers nothing as to why these two are not of any value. What do you mean when you adopt the characterization of Elbrus as an "outhouse" and of what relevance is it if Russia lost or won the WWII for the Statue of the Motherland?

The Booze Allen report includes only 124 countries. Where are the rest of them? And of course which are these countries? I wonder why they are not included.

P.S Russia has 23 world heritage sites according to wikipeia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Europe
Furthermore all sites were inscribed after 1990 shortly before the collapse of the U.S.S.R and none prior to that in contrast to other countries (understand what I' getting at?)
http://whc.unesco.org/en/list
www.britannica.com/eb/topic-648327/World-Heritage-site -


La Russophobe says:

GDP:

Shame on you for forgetting to mention the Kremlin's recent attacks on bloggers and internet news sources, including an attempt to regulate internet news sources. While asking me to tell a wider story, you yourself focus on telling only a narrower one that serves your own agenda. Tsk tsk tsk! Read more about that topic here:

http://russophobe.blogspot.com/search/label/internet

Shame on you also for failing to cite a figure for Russian access to the internet use weekly or monthly that would change this picture in any meaningful way. "God forbid let's not get into such detail now shall we." Yikes! What hypocrisy!

Russians weren't asked what HAS BEEN a national wonder, they asked what IS ONE, you ninny.

Does it make you feel better to imagine that Russia is better than the countries not on the BA list but still at the bottom of their list? If so, your head needs work. Why do you seek to rationalize Russian failure rather than improve it, thereby helping it to continue? Why do you hate Russians so much that you want them to continue to live in misery?


La Russophobe says:

Russians who do use the internet spend 1/3 less time than Europeans who use it:

http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2176

In 2005 only 17% of the population had any access:

http://www.multilingual-search.com/russian-internet-usage-at-17-of-population/12/03/2006


gdp says:

Shame on you for forgetting to mention the Kremlin's recent attacks on bloggers and internet news sources, including an attempt to regulate internet news sources. While asking me to tell a wider story, you yourself focus on telling only a narrower one that serves your own agenda. Tsk tsk tsk! Read more about that topic here:

http://russophobe.blogspot.com/search/label/internet

Typically irrelevant but then again you obviously have nothing to say.

Shame on you also for failing to cite a figure for Russian access to the internet use weekly or monthly that would change this picture in any meaningful way. "God forbid let's not get into such detail now shall we." Yikes! What hypocrisy!

Well at least when I do decide to cite something, the source will be accessible to your readers. But the relationship between Russians and the Internet is not the main topic in this case. I just picked up on it as
an observation. I never claimed 90% of Russians use the Internet 24/7. Do you honestly expect me to find a site that makes any reference to use of the particular site concerning russian access to the internet. Sorry it was my own comment.

Russians weren't asked what HAS BEEN a national wonder, they asked what IS ONE, you ninny.

No comment, I think any remotely intelligent person can judge for themselves.Maybe you might want to be a bit more polite next time.

Thank you for providing some sources on Russians and the Internet but I'm afraid they are off topic. But then again, you connected monuments and natural sights with xenophobia.


gdp says:

a small change
Russophobe:
"Shame on you for forgetting to mention the Kremlin's recent attacks on bloggers and internet news sources, including an attempt to regulate internet news sources. While asking me to tell a wider story, you yourself focus on telling only a narrower one that serves your own agenda. Tsk tsk tsk! Read more about that topic here:

http://russophobe.blogspot.com/search/label/internet"

Typically irrelevant but then again you obviously have nothing to say.

Russophobe:
"Shame on you also for failing to cite a figure for Russian access to the internet use weekly or monthly that would change this picture in any meaningful way. "God forbid let's not get into such detail now shall we." Yikes! What hypocrisy!"

Well at least when I do decide to cite something, the source will be accessible to your readers. But the relationship between Russians and the Internet is not the main topic in this case. I just picked up on it as
an observation. I never claimed 90% of Russians use the Internet 24/7. Do you honestly expect me to find a site that makes any reference to use of the particular site concerning russian access to the internet. Sorry it was my own comment.

Russians weren't asked what HAS BEEN a national wonder, they asked what IS ONE, you ninny.

No comment, I think any remotely intelligent person can judge for themselves.Maybe you might want to be a bit more polite next time.

Thank you for providing some sources on Russians and the Internet but I'm afraid they are off topic. But then again, you connected monuments and natural sights with xenophobia.

Russophobe:
"Does it make you feel better to imagine that Russia is better than the countries not on the BA list but still at the bottom of their list? If so, your head needs work."

No, it does not make me feel better, I'm just being rational. Pray tell me what on earth is wrong with being rational and why would my head need work for being rational.

Russophobe:
"Why do you seek to rationalize Russian failure rather than improve it, thereby helping it to continue? Why do you hate Russians so much that you want them to continue to live in misery?"

Something tells me I've heard this cliche before. I don't feel I'm in a position to influence Russia.


justme says:

This was not "Wonders of the world" but "wonders of Russia" project. What is so bad in a poll where people can vote for places and monuments in their own country? And the fact that someone outside Russia doesn't know what the Valley of Geisers is speaks of one's own ignorance, not the insignificance of a natural wonder. Let us have our wonders, what is your problem with that? We know what Stonehenge is, and we think it is a great historical site, historical and natural legacy that needs to be preserved and respected. Why would you deprive the nation of its rigth to have its historical and natural legacy? I just don't get it.


justme says:

This was not "Wonders of the world" but "wonders of Russia" project. What is so bad in a poll where people can vote for places and monuments in their own country? And the fact that someone outside Russia doesn't know what the Valley of Geisers is speaks of one's own ignorance, not the insignificance of a natural wonder. Let us have our wonders, what is your problem with that? We know what Stonehenge is, and we think it is a great historical site, historical and natural legacy that needs to be preserved and respected. Why would you deprive the nation of its rigth to have its historical and natural legacy? I just don't get it.


Andrew says:

A) I see nothing about xenophobia here. Feel that you invented a cool name, but had no better place to use it? So much for the title.

B) Health and Sanitation... Hm. Let's see. Widely popular global issues like cholera and an alphabet of hepatitises curiously absent from the food and water supply? Check. More stringent rules from the local version of the FDA, which, among other things, for example, ban any and all chicken from the USA for high content of toxins such as chlorine? Check [I dare you to say something about politics and sanctions here. 'Ex-soviet yankeephobes undermine Bush regime by banning chicken. Seriously.] More doctors per capita than anywhere else in the world? Sure, they might not make you an MRI, but they can certianly treat any infectious disease that you can possibly contract there, and without charging you five figures for it - CHECK.

C) Terrorism: strangely enough, NYC has statistically been a more dangerous place to be in this given millenium.

D) Violent crime: see above, also applies here.

E) Petty crime: rather irrelevant, but, still, see point C

F) Roads & Infrastructure vs. Environment and Territory Protected from Development : figure out your position already. Can't have developed territory without any roads in the general vicinity. Can't have a pristine environment *with* roads in the general vicinity. Oh, and it is the largest country in the world, yet has a relatively tiny population of 140 million. Hence >>> you can actually find the environment peacefully existing outside fenced-off plots proudly called Parks.

G) Proximity to Georgia and Terrorism: Georgia is actually a Christian country. The political situation between Russia and Georgia is certainly quite nasty, but neither side has had the presence of mind to even suspect the other of terrorism. Huh.

H) HIV: use your brain. Avoid illegal pastimes like hiring prostitutes and injecting drugs. Besides a risk of HIV, such activities generally also exponentially increase your chances of getting roughed-up, mugged, murdered, and jailed. Cause they're CRIMINALS. DUH!







戸田恵梨香 彼氏 says:

nice site. thanks.






メル友 says:

メル友テーマパークFunSpot出会いジェネ出会い系一徹出会い系の王様裏出会い系サイト100出会い系サイト出会い系サイト【モバイル出会い】人妻ハンター人妻GETだぜ!人妻コレクター人妻焙煎メル友60億/1メル友エンジェル-無料のメル友探し-メル友サイト~優良~メル友探偵-メルタン-生メル友メル友ズキュンメル友-めるふれ!メル友恋の花メル友classメル友カサブランカ





sdf says:

DVD burner for Mac provides an easy and fast way to convert popular video formats (including AVI, MPEG, WMV, DivX, XviD, MP4, DV, VOB, ASF, 3GP, NUT, YUV, H.264/AVC, M4V files to DVD. The DVD Burner Mac could also burn DVD movie onto DVD disk that playable on portable or home DVD player and burn DVD folder or ISO files. No other Mac DVD burner can provide so many formats.
DivX to DVD Converter for Mac can not only convert DivX to DVD Mac, but also support convert AVI to DVD, 3GP to DVD, MP4 to DVD, FLV to DVD, MPEG to DVD, WMV to DVD, etc.
The DivX to DVD Converter Mac developed only for Mac OS (include Mac OS X 10.5 leopard) burning users.
The DivX to DVD converter for Mac can convert all formats like MP4, M4V, MPA, MPG, MPEG, MOV,3GP, 3GP2, FLV, MOV,VOB, DAT, TS, TP, TRP, M2TS, DivX, DivX to DVD on Mac OS.
AVI to DVD for Mac, a profeesional but easy-to-use DVD burn software for Mac users, can convert AVI to DVD format on Mac OS X perfectly and quickly. The AVI to DVD Mac not only supports converting AVI to DVD Mac but also supports other popular formats to DVD on Mac, such as MPA, ASF, DIF, H261, YUV, NUT and so on.
With the AVI to DVD Mac, you can easily convert and burn AVI files to your DVD and play it on portable or home DVD player.









Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/839