Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

House of Putin, House of Saud

Filed under: Middle East ~ Russia

ALeqM5i2NY7irUtH_QvTeYnAqZBMUOahSw.jpg

In certain quarters (blubber blob Michael Moore's, for instance), efforts by U.S. President Bush to cultivate close relations with Saudi Arabia are vilified as corrupt and evil. Yet, Bush was doing nothing more than continuing one of the most stable tenets of U.S. foreign policy since World War II, strategic alliance with the Saudis, and the picture above clearly shows why. Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, fresh from a new round of neo-Soviet West bashing, hosted Crown Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz in Moscow last week and is lobbying for a major arms sale to the Kingdom. Putin is obviously seeking to split Saudi Arabia, a major source of crude oil for the U.S. and, as such, a major bulwark against Russian blackmail, away from the American orbit. If we allow him to do so, we will have only ourselves to blame when oil costs $1,000 a barrel.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Vova says:

Regarding your statement that "Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, fresh from a new round of neo-Soviet West bashing"... I respectfully disagree. The malignant little troll is not a human; he is a cornered rat and cannot therefore be a dictator; he is a snakebitten hostage to murderers and thugs, and calling him a dictator is a compliment. Moreover, I would not call "Russia" neo-Soviet. It's paleo-Soviet neo-Nazi, an illegitimate political entity.
Playing the Saudi card won't work, or so I hope, they will buy some hardware and continue to fund Wahhabi sects in northern Caucasus and the Volga region until the evil empire breaks up and the moslems take over


rich says:

The word you were looking for was probably tenets, not tenants, though I have to admit that "tenants of US foreign policy" is a pretty descriptive phrase for Saudi rule of Arabia and for most of the Middle East despots for that matter.


Josh says:

The main thing is that we must overthrow the Saudi misogyofascist regime, they're a natural alliance for the cornered rat's paleo-Soviet neo-Nazi regime. These people just sentenced a woman to whipping and jail after she got gang-raped, and the State Dept won't say peep! The people at littlegreenfootballs are up in arms about it, I wish Kim was too. The point is that it's not just the malignant troll who has to go, it's all these malignant trolls, the Saudis first since they funded the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Read Richard Perle's book, he too argues that we should overthrow this evil corrupt Saudi regime and save its women!


colleen says:

"Putin is obviously seeking to split Saudi Arabia, a major source of crude oil for the U.S. and, as such, a major bulwark against Russian blackmail, away from the American orbit."

Yeah, like we are trying to split Central Asia, Eastern Europe, and the Caucasus from Russia's orbit, successfully during the 90s, less successfully now.

Maybe the US should bargain with Russia to identify spheres of influence if it doesn't want competition over allies it considers vital like Saudi Arabia.

Otherwise be prepared for fierce competition. Russia can and should compete for influence not just in its neighborhood, but also in strategic regions of the worlds. And, like it or not, Russia will be able to replace America's preeminent political and economic role in many countries, including many American allies (this has started already).

For example, many American companies have a bad reputation around the world; of savagely exploiting natural resource-rich countries, usually bribing corrupt officials to land lucrative deals at the expense of the people and the environment. Slave-like employment conditions are often found.

Meanwhile, the United States' arrogant idea that it possesses an obligation to tell countries what to do has rubbed many the wrong way. It constantly oversteps its bounds in every way (and it doesn't matter if a donkey or an elephant is in the White House, interference is a constant American policy whoever is in charge).

As a result, we see a divided NATO (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain have decided that American imperialism shall not be "in their name") and off-the-charts animosity for the US in much of the developing world. Indirectly, we see disruptions in the flow of oil in Nigeria and sky-high energy prices.

Anyway, regarding Russia-Saudi Arabia, I think there's something there.

In general, a pick-up in talks between Russia and Arab states has been occurred since the Munich speech. Then and there, the reluctant became certain that Putin is their man - that he does possesses the courage to unmask the United States for the savage empire it is trying to be.

At the same time, Russia has strengthened its alliance with Israel and relations between the countries have become so good that they agreed last month to open-up travel by eliminating visa requirements.







Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/516