Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Mr. Obama, Imploding

Filed under: US Elections

071114_EXP_BarackTN.jpgSome Democrats like to bash George W. Bush for his supposed lack of intelligence. One might point out that Bush has become the fourth Republican since World War II to win a second elected presidential term with a majority of the popular vote, something the Democrats have yet to accomplish even once in all that time, so perhaps they need to revise their definition of smart somewhat. Or, one might simply cast one's appalled glance at Barack Obama.

Under Title 36, Section 306 of the U.S. Code, when the U.S. National Anthem ("The Star-Spangled Banner") is played in one's presence, one is to "stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart."

In September, first-term Senator Barack Obama, while seeking the U.S. presidential nomination, was photographed standing on stage along with rival candidates (Bill Richardson and Hillary Clinton) in front of a giant American flag while the U.S. National Anthem was being played. Both rivals had their hands over their hearts. Obama didn't.

When asked why he didn't put his hand over his heart, Obama said his grandfather told him he didn't have to.

Perhaps a U.S. Senator, to say nothing of a presidential wannabe, should have a source of information about the U.S. Code slightly more sophisticated than his grampy? Perhaps someone wishing access to the nuclear button should have at least a drop more horse sense?

Don't forget: Just last month, Mr. Obama would go on to announce he'd stop wearing an American flag pin on his lapel, in order to protest the war in Iraq. He said he'd show his patriotism in "other ways" -- like, presumably, violating the law when he hears the National Anthem.

The capper to all this is that when Obama was accused in a political e-mail of lacking patriotism, he tried to throw up a smokescreen by focusing on the fact that the e-mail claimed he was hearing the pledge of allegiance in the photograph when in fact he was listening to the anthem and wailing about slurs and smears. It's quite true that the e-mail unfairly accused him of actually refusing to say the pledge, which he's never done. It's also quite true that that couldn't be more beside the point. He is, in fact, flouting the most basic indicia of patriotism, and he's egregiously unfamiliar with U.S. law for someone who purports to lead the nation. And instead of talking openly about that, he's ducking for cover. So much for Mr. Golden Boy.

The e-mail also accused Obama of hiding his father's Muslim religious faith. Obama tried to dodge that issue by waxing indignant about the pledge of allegiance "smear," a total red herring. Ask yourself this: When was the last time you heard Obama speak openly and proudly about Islam?

Obama has never been governor or vice president, a qualification every single elected president since Eisenhower has held (except for JFK, who won by the one of the narrowest margins in history, didn't get a majority of the popular vote and didn't serve out his term). Other than one famous general, you have to go back to Herbert Hoover and the Great Depression before you find a president elected without that credential. Obama has Muslim connections in the time of 9/11 and his name sounds like Osama. Yet, with all these risk factors, he's not smart enough to handle this simple matter of patriotism any better? You don't need to know anything more.

This man is not qualified to be a U.S. Senator, much less president of the USA.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


John says:

Kim, Obama is a Christian and a proud member of the United Church of Christ in Chicago. Barack Obama never was a Muslim. Obama's Kenyan father was raised as a Muslim, though he was an atheist at the time he arrived in the US where he met Obama's white American mother( in the early sixties). Barack Obama wasn't raised by his father but by his white grandparents who were living in Hawaii. The false email has been debunked by Snopes,
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama


Dominic says:

Who really cares? To be honest, I don't put my hand over my heart during the national anthem. I had the same thoughts as Obama (hand over heart during pledge, stand at attention during anthem). I guess Obama and I are are the dumbest people around. We should both probably both have our citizenship revoked and be classified as terrorists.

Meanwhile, I'm sure all the Republican candidates have the US Code memorized and consider it lively reading.

Why can't we focus on things that really matter? How does this affect Americans?


John says:

Kim wrote: "Obama has never been governor or vice president, a qualification every single elected president since Eisenhower has held"

Oh really? John F Kennedy was a U.S. Senator before he became President of the United States.


La Russophobe says:

JOHN:

I'd really like to thank you for your comments. In addition to educating me on a few points (I've updated the post to reflect them), you've also perfectly illustrated the thesis of this post by dodging the point, Obama and the flag and judgment, and trying to distract readers' attention by raising red herrings -- just as Obama himself is doing. That's hardly the way to make him a better candidate (though you don't say you have any wish to do so).

Perfect!

DOMINIC:

If you actually read the post, you'll see that the main point isn't his patriotism (though surely you must admit many Americans may wish him to follow the law, to say nothing of doing as they do, if he'll be a national role model; I, for one, certainly do, and if you look at the photograph you'll see two other prominent Americans who agree with me). The point is his judgment and his ability to act high-and-mighty towards Republicans. Given the obvious obstacles he faces, what he's doing is just plain stupid, and according to Democrats we don't need stupid presidents.


armchair pessimist says:

LaR,

Maybe, just maybe, we might see eye to eye on this one.
I would greatly enjoy watching President Obama go to Moscow to practice his "agressive diplomacy" and to be sent back puree in a tin bucket. A total lightweight.

You?



La Russophobe says:

JOHN:

First link: Yeah but that's the pledge, he was already doing that. I don't think we've got through to him yet on the anthem, much less the lapel pin, and by the look on his face he seems none to happy/proud to be saying the pledge, does he?

Second link: More great stuff! They say the others could be guilty of an infraction as well "as they had their backs to the flag" yet how do they know that was the only flag? They had their backs to A flag, not necessarily the only one, and if they were wrong then Obama was DOUBLE wrong -- but the link chooses speculate that the others might be wrong without acknowledging this would make Obama twice the villian! Seems like more smokescreen, doesn't it? Do two wrongs make a right? Is this really the way for the first black candidate to get elected? Doesn't seem likely. More smokescreen in that while they claim this event in the photo might not be a "patriotic event" they ignore the fact that Obama didn't invoke any such rule to defend himself, but instead relied on grampy. What's more, the "patriotic event" provision is not in the language they quote.

You too! Vaya con dios!


Aris Katsaris says:

Once again Kim provides another example of how he intends to destroy the original purpose of this blog (supposedly concerning democratic revolutions) and turn it into a insanely parochial instrument for Republican propaganda machine instead, rather than a globally-minded instrument for supporting democratic revolutions.

I'm sure that in your mind, Mr. Kim, the similarity between the names "Obama" and "Osama" are significant. Kindergarteners and their like-minded conservatives always do these name-gimmicks that most of the rest of the rest of the population has outgrown at the age of 10.

A proper or improper salute to the flag is also obviously an obvious example of democratic credentials and lack thereof -- why bother discussing actual anti-democratic practices of Bush (e.g. signing statements, abolition of habeas corpus) when we can discuss flag lapels instead.

You make me sick.

You say: "One might point out that Bush has become the fourth Republican since World War II to win a second elected presidential term with a majority of the popular vote, something the Democrats have yet to accomplish even once in all that time"

He won the second term with a majority, but didn't win the first one with such. And each of those two facts might even be *vaguely* significant if the "majority of the popular vote" had anything to do with the actual US election system.

As it is, both his success in getting the second term with a coincidental majority of popular vote and the first term with a coincidental minority thereof, remain totally insignificant -- except as evidence of your continuing mania about displaying any random fact that catches your fancy whether its relevant to democratic revolutions or not.


La Russophobe says:

ARIS:

Once again you display hilarious dishonesty in suggesting what the overall content of this blog is. Your suggestion that the coming US presidential elections are not relevant to the issue of worldwide democracy is turnip-like in its ignorance.

Your comment doesn't even try to fairly address the substantive content of this post. If you think the American public is oblivious to Obama's weird name and overt lack of patriotism, that it can't influence his electability, that he doesn't need to compensate for it, then you're a truly epic moron living on an other planet.

You're also an unrepentant liar and propagandist, yet you attack me on similar grounds -- which makes you a really amazing hypocrite as well. And if you don't like this blog, why do you read and comment on it so much? You're welcome to depart any time and will not be missed.

And by the way, I'm a girl you pathetic ape.


Aris Katsaris says:

"Your suggestion that the coming US presidential elections are not relevant to the issue of worldwide democracy is turnip-like in its ignorance."

I certainly think that the *democratic credentials* of the presidential candidates are relevant to the issue of worldwide democracy. Flag pins and salutes -- no, they *shouldn't* be relevant. The similarity between the names Osama and Obama -- no, it *shouldn't* be relevant.

The fact that you argue it is relevant is what downgrades you to an actively *negative* force in the cause of worldwide democracy.

"If you think the American public is oblivious to Obama's weird name and overt lack of patriotism, that it can't influence his electability,"

Yeah, now you are pretending you were simply stating a potential problem about his name that may unfairly prejudice his electability, right?

Except that I don't see you bashing those idiots that care enough about his name to prejudice them negatively against the man. I see you simply *being* one of those idiots.

You were merely meaning to say "Please pay no attention to the fact he has a muslim-sounding name. Please pay no attention to his ancestry, judge him by his own democratic credential alone/" is *that* what your readers are supposed to be getting from your words?

Do you really think we're so much children as to believe that?

"You're also an unrepentant liar and propagandist"

Liar? Amusing. What have I lied about?

"And by the way, I'm a girl you pathetic ape."

So what? Did wrong usage of pronouns offend you? Neither gender is a shame to be.

Btw, I'm a human, you pathetic girl.


fozzy says:

Aris -

Why the *hell* are you putting asterisk' around random words? It's really *annoying*.


Maquis says:

Practicing Muslim or not, the man attended a Muslim school as a child. The critical question is did the man say the Shadada? This Muslim declaration of faith is the irrevocable entry to Islam, and I am exceedingly curious as to whether or not he said it, and I think all Americans should be. Obama may consider having done so to be inconsequential, but better than a billion Muslims world-wide beg to differ. Can one imagine the joy of the Muslim world to have an apostate Muslim American president? Gotta be one heck of a foreign policy challenge there!


Jake says:

Its kinda sad if you base you decesion on who to vote for on something as small as when someone doesn't put his hand over his heart when hearing the anthem. I don't see any of my friends do it....

Obama shows his pariotism other ways, by making decesions that improve our nation.

OBAMA 08 BABY!


wow gold says:

publius


tim says:

plain and simple. I dont believe in putting anyone such as obama in any office. He does not act presidential and is easily provoked, very dangerous. I wish we did not have a title next to the names then people from both parties would be forced to examine the person and not what party.

I think obama would be a disaster in the making, raising taxes and going to the world for approval, europe has tons of problems, and he wanted their approval. Lets fix things here at home first and then go bask in their applause afterwards.


tim says:

plain and simple. I dont believe in putting anyone such as obama in any office. He does not act presidential and is easily provoked, very dangerous. I wish we did not have a title next to the names then people from both parties would be forced to examine the person and not what party.

I think obama would be a disaster in the making, raising taxes and going to the world for approval, europe has tons of problems, and he wanted their approval. Lets fix things here at home first and then go bask in their applause afterwards.






jordan shoes wholesale says:

we prefer to buy a pair of cheap nike Shoes if they'r the same of brand.we can feel it comfortable what brought
by Air Jordan Shoes,but also relaxing from Jordan Kicks.once u wear Jordan Shoes,even u think u'r the NO.1,
you'r be more confident than before .i like Jordan Shoes.


Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/492