Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Battle Kosovo

Filed under: Russia

Just as Russia "liberated" Poland from the Nazis only to subject it to another and even longer period of brutal abuse, including the seminal outrage of the Katyn massacre, one of the single most barbaric events in all of human history, so Russia is is now exploiting Serbia, seeking to seize control of the country's energy industry by fomenting its paranoia over independence for Kosovo by promising to obstruct progress on that issue in exchange for Serbia signing over its energy soul.

But does Russia understand what it is getting itself into? The Wall Street Journal states:

Presidential elections in Serbia may give Brussels and Washington a false sense of security about Kosovo. By a narrow margin, Serbs on Sunday re-elected Boris Tadic, who wants to bring the country closer to Europe, over the pro-Russia candidate. But his government already staunchly opposed Kosovo independence and stonewalled in handing over war criminals Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic. The EU's indulgent offers of possible membership for Serbia aren't likely to change that. Belgrade was so eager for Russian backing on Kosovo that it gave Gazprom its national gas company, strategically far more important for Serbia than the small, poor, province in its south. With its own Presidential poll next month, Russia may be tempted to press this hot button issue by again claiming a Kosovo precedent for "frozen conflicts" such as Abkhazia and Trans-Dniestr in its neighborhood. But someone could remind Moscow that it then might apply to Russia's own ethnic minority republics, starting with Chechnya. In the meantime, the Western allies would be wise to guard against instability in the Caucasus and Moldova and come up with a credible response against any misbehavior by Moscow, including with sanctions.

Sanctions. It's come to this. This is where Vladimir Putin has led his nation, to the very brink of utter ruin. Russia is now to be treated by the civilized countries of the world just as if it were Libya, or Iran. Serbia will lose all, and then Russia will lose all, including most especially any last vestige of credibility it had as a G-8 member. Just like the USSR before it, Russia is prepared to sacrifice all, most especially the ordinary citizens of Russia itself, in the vain hope of achieving empire.

As all this geopolitical posturing continues, less and less of the Kremlin's energy and resources are spent improving the lives of the citizens of Russia. Disease runs rampant. Russia is #3 in the world for suicides per capita. Poland, remembering the Soviet past only too clearly, has embraced a missile defense system despite Russia's vehement protests. Ukraine, after having been admitted to the WTO ahead of Russia, thence to sit in judgment, has begun admitting Russians as political refugees of oppression as they flee the worst excesses of the Putin dictatorship. In January, the Russian stock market lost a stunning 17% of its value, and the illusion of it being a safe harbor because of Russia's oil revenues was laid waste. And as we previously reported, Human Rights Watch issued a scathing condemnation of the Putin regime, comparing Putin to comical tinpot maniac Robert Mugabe.

No longer can we see the people of Russia as largely victims of the Kremlin's oppression. This illusion was possible in Soviet times, but now we have seen the people of Russia choose to be ruled by a KGB spy, and look the other way as he brutally crushed the last remnants of civil society under his jackboot. The people of Russia are not only not victims of the Kremlin's actions, they are the root cause of them.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Jim says:

This is a very poor piece of analysis based on an outstandingly biased op-ed. The Wall Street Journal never resists the chance to push for Kosovo's independence and kick Serbia when an opportunity arises. Really, if you are going to write on the Balkans can I suggest that you base your argument on more balanced sources in future!


Mark Adomanis says:

You'll probably delete this comment, Kim, or LR, or whatever other alias you want to be called, but this is outstandingly biased and extremely misleading.

First you seem to have basic facts confused when you say:
"Just as Russia "liberated" Poland from the Nazis only to subject it to another and even longer period of brutal abuse, including the seminal outrage of the Katyn massacre, one of the single most barbaric events in all of human history,"

Katyn happened in 1940 after the Soviets and Germans both invaded Poland, not after the Soviets "liberated" it from the Nazis several years later. Katyn was a massacre of an officer corps that Stalin regarded as potential subversives in the part of Poland he had bargained with Hitler to control. Your "analysis" makes it sound like the Soviets did this after the war was over which is, of course, false.
If you knew anything about WWII, which of course you don't, you would know that however brutal the Soviet occupation of Poland was, and it was brutal, it paled in comparison to the bestiality of the Nazis. This is not hard to understand. Stalin was horrible, brutal, and lethal. Hitler was worse. During the war and the German occupation of Poland, something like 20% of the entire country's population perished; something the Soviets never even remotely came close to during their rule which lasted up to 1989.

"Sanctions. It's come to this. This is where Vladimir Putin has led his nation, to the very brink of utter ruin."
Right, because the industrialized world, at a time of near-recession, with subject itself to a self-imposed oil embargo. As you always try to remind your readers, LR, the Russian economy is heavily dependent on energy exports. So if the "West" does in fact apply sanctions to tame the Russian bear, it would be shooting itself in the foot (that's putting it nicely, given the weakness of the US economy, it would be like shooting itself in the face) because sanctions on Russia would massively raise world energy exports. You could, and I'm sure would, laugh at the harm this would cause to the Russians but it would hurt us almost as severely and would put a lot of money into the pockets of people you love, like Chavez, Ahmadinejad, and the Saudis.

"And as we previously reported, Human Rights Watch issued a scathing condemnation of the Putin regime, comparing Putin to comical tinpot maniac Robert Mugabe."
Is this the same Human Rights march that daily attacks your boy George W. Bush and considers the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo to be tantamount to war crimes? Is it that very same Human Rights march? Did you support them before? If not, why not, and why should we listen to them before if you (hysterically I'm sure) called them "terrorist coddling cowards?"


La Russophobe says:

Hmmm, let's see. I'm biased, but you accuse me of deleting your comment before the fact, and proceed to deliver an entirely one-sided lecture of your own.

Hypocrite!


La Russophobe says:

JIM:

It's not an op-ed, it's the WSJ's EDITORIAL. Sorry if you missed that day in school, but an EDITORIAL is SUPPOSED to argue for a position. That's what it's there for.

The WSJ is one of the most powerful and widely respected newspapers on the planet, and I'm one of the most significant Russia bloggers. For you to dismiss us so blithely merely undermines your own credibility and displays your own bias. Think your comment constitutes even-handed fact reporting?

Think again.


Artfldgr says:

During the war and the German occupation of Poland, something like 20% of the entire country's population perished; something the Soviets never even remotely came close to during their rule which lasted up to 1989.

While your history is better than pretty much most of everyone elses, its still not fully honest.

Especially in your assertion that Hitler was worse than Stalin. Care to ask the women that threw their babies onto trains in hopes they will be found and fed rather than starve to death?

Poland signed a worthless non aggression pact with germany and the soviet union. Both those then conspired to carve up the world. Stalin held back so that he could blame Hitler, and it nearly backfired on him when Hitler decided to remove his friend too.

September 1939 both countries rolled in and took what was not theirs from their ‘friends’. Germany as a state was more connected with the world than russia was, and so the facts about germany became more prevalent than similar facts about russia.

Just do be clear, remember the words of Edward Rydz-Smigly? No I doubt you do, and I am sure the others don’t either.

"With the Germans we run the risk of losing our liberty. With the Russians we will lose our soul"

The Russians lost Poland to the germans, and so didn’t have the time nor the cover of war to do to them what they did to the Latvians, Estonians, and others.

Whats interesting is your pick of the 20%.

From wiki
These territories were repopulated with Poles expelled from the eastern regions by the Soviet Union and other territories. The new Poland emerged 20% smaller by 77,500 square kilometres (29,900 sq mi).

Stalin was determined that Poland's new government should be Communist, and therefore ultimately under his control. He had severed relations with the Polish government-in-exile in London in 1943 in the aftermath of the Katyn Massacre, but to appease Roosevelt and Churchill he agreed at Yalta that a coalition government would be formed. The Prime Minister of the Polish government in exile, Stanisław Mikołajczyk, resigned his post and, with several other Polish exile leaders, went to Lublin in eastern Poland, where the Communist-controlled provisional government had been established. This government was headed by a Socialist, Edward Osóbka-Morawski, but the Communists held a majority of key posts. It was recognized by the Western Allies in July 1945. Stalin also agreed that Poland would receive a $US10 billion reparation payment from Germany.
The attitude of the Polish population towards Soviet entry was generally hostile, while some cases existed of welcoming them, they soon turned into hatred and despise as Red Army soldiers engaged in plunder, rape, banditry, while NKVD implemented a reign of political terror. In the eyes of Polish society which wasn't yet under the Soviet occupation in 1939-1941 the Soviets became a new occupiers, and soon protests and demands of their withdrawal have spread among the country. A popular belief was that Western Allies will soon defeat Soviets using atomic weapons and free Poland.[10]

The Germans mostly killed, Russians used them up.

As recent as a few months ago, Katyn facts have been updated with new information. At least your educated enough to not try to make the massacre the work of the Germans when it was the work of Russians attempting to make a frame up.

Here is what YOU said as to Katyn.

Katyn happened in 1940 after the Soviets and Germans both invaded Poland, not after the Soviets "liberated" it from the Nazis several years later. Katyn was a massacre of an officer corps that Stalin regarded as potential subversives in the part of Poland he had bargained with Hitler to control. Your "analysis" makes it sound like the Soviets did this after the war was over which is, of course, false.

Lets compare them with the CURRENT knowledge of Katyn.

You get one point for the date. The event happened during april may of 1940. You lose your point as to who was killed.

The victims were Polish officers, soldiers, and civilians captured by the Red Army after it invaded eastern Poland in September 1939. Strictly speaking, even the Polish servicemen were not POWs. The USSR had not declared war, and the Polish commander in chief had ordered his troops not to engage Soviet forces. But there was little the Poles could do. On 28 September, the USSR and Nazi Germany, allied since August, partitioned and then dissolved the Polish state. They then began implementing parallel policies of suppressing all resistance and destroying the Polish elite in their respective areas. The NKVD and the Gestapo coordinated their actions on many issues, including prisoner exchanges. At Brest Litovsk, Soviet and German commanders held a joint victory parade before German forces withdrew westward behind a new demarcation line.

That description above is a world of difference from yours… care to check the facts? Let me know what fact is wrong. hint: none.

Official records, opened in 1990 when glasnost was still in vogue, show that Stalin had every intention of treating the Poles as political prisoners. Just two days after the invasion began on 17 September, the NKVD created a Directorate of Prisoners of War. 2 It took custody of Polish prisoners from the Army and began organizing a network of reception centers and transfer camps and arranging rail transport to the western USSR. Once there, the Poles were placed in "special" (concentration) camps, where, from October to February, they were subjected to lengthy interrogations and constant political agitation. The camps were at Kozelsk, Starobelsk, and Ostashkov, all three located on the grounds of former Orthodox monasteries converted into prisons. The NKVD dispatched one of its rising stars, Maj. Vassili Zarubin, to Kozelsk, where most of the officers were kept, to conduct interviews. Zarubin presented himself to the Poles as a charming, sympathetic, and cultured Soviet official, which led many prisoners into sharing confidences that would cost them their lives.

During April-May 1940, the Polish prisoners were moved from their internment camps and taken to three execution sites. The place most identified with the Soviet atrocity is Katyn Forest, located 12 miles west of Smolensk, Russia. For years historians assumed that the grounds of an NKVD rest and recreation facility were both an execution and burial site for nearly a fifth of the unfortunate Poles who found themselves in Soviet captivity. Post-Cold War revelations, however, suggest that the victims were shot in the basement of the NKVD headquarters in Smolensk and at an abattoir in the same city, although some may have been executed at a site in the forest itself. In any event, the Katyn Forest is--and will probably long remain--the main symbol of the atrocity, even if it was not the actual killing field.

If you want, you can go online and you can read the leter from beria to stalin proposing the executions.

The Katyn Forest massacre was a criminal act of historic proportions and enduring political implications. When Nazi occupation forces in April 1943 announced the discovery of several mass graves, propaganda minister Josef Goebbels hoped that international revulsion over the Soviet atrocity would drive a wedge into the Big Three coalition and buy Germany a breathing space, if not a victory, in its war against Russia. (A headline in the May 1943 Newsweek read: "Poles vs. Reds: Allied Unity Put to Test Over Officer Dead.") But Goebbels miscalculated. Despite overwhelming evidence of Soviet responsibility, Moscow blamed the Germans, and for the rest of the war Washington and London officially accepted the Soviet countercharge. When the Polish government-in-exile in London demanded an international inquiry, Stalin used this as a pretext to break relations. The Western allies objected but eventually acquiesced. Soon thereafter, the Soviet dictator assembled a group of Polish Communists that returned to Poland with the Red Army in 1944 and formed the nucleus of the postwar government. Stalin's experience with the Katyn affair may have convinced him that the West, grateful for the Red Army's contribution to the Allied military effort, would find it hard to confront him over Poland after the war.

Did you know that someone survived?

Professor Stanislaw Swianiewicz was the sole survivor of Katyn. He was waiting to board a bus to the forest area when an NKVD colonel arrived and pulled him out of line. Swianiewicz was an internationally recognized expert on forced labor in Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany, who had been born in Poland when it was still part of the Russian empire, and had studied in Moscow. He ended up in Siberia, and after the war emigrated to the United States, where he taught economics at the University of Notre Dame. At least one CIA analyst remembers the professor from his days in South Bend.
Those who died at Katyn included an admiral, two generals, 24 colonels, 79 lieutenant colonels, 258 majors, 654 captains, 17 naval captains, 3,420 NCOs, seven chaplains, three landowners, a prince, 43 officials, 85 privates, and 131 refugees. Also among the dead were 20 university professors; 300 physicians; several hundred lawyers, engineers, and teachers; and more than 100 writers and journalists as well as about 200 pilots. 7 It was their social status that landed them in front of NKVD execution squads. Most of the victims were reservists who had been mobilized when Germany invaded. In all, the NKVD eliminated almost half the Polish officer corps--part of Stalin's long-range effort to prevent the resurgence of an independent Poland.
Recent historical research shows that 700-900 of the victims were Polish Jews. 8 Ironically, the Germans knew this, and it complicated Goebbels' effort to portray the atrocity as a "Jewish-Bolshevik conspiracy"--a mainstay of the Nazi regime's anti-Semitic propaganda.

We have the lists of who were killed. Its possible to get them and determine who and what they are. and your explanation does not fit the facts. If one knows ALL the facts one cant discount this as the execution of a bunch of subversives.

Even more telling. It also shows that you’re of the mental twist that says its ok to execute people for no thinking the way the state wants them to.

By telling us how Stalin thought, you are implying that his thinking was correct, and that the outcome was necessary. Its end justifies the means thinking, aka pragmatism.

Here is a bit on the coverup by russia… of course if the actions were such a goodness, why then cover them up so much? because they weren’t such, but very bad, and exposed the true nature of soviet rule!!!

It shows that the point your trying to make as to when it happened was not clouded by the analysis above, but was actually clouded by soviet operations to hide, obfuscate, and change the reality, and so the perceived outcome.

For 50 years, the Soviet Union concealed the truth. The coverup began in April 1943, almost immediately after the Red Army had recaptured Smolensk. The NKVD destroyed a cemetery the Germans had permitted the Polish Red Cross to build and removed other evidence. In January 1944, Moscow appointed its own investigative body, known as the Burdenko Commission after the prominent surgeon who chaired it. Predictably, it concluded that the Polish prisoners had been murdered in 1941, during the German occupation, not in 1940.

So much of the mix up is because of Stalinists (revisionists) screwing around with history, and in general, injecting tons of crap into modern literature and histories poisoning the wealth of knowledge. [by the way, this is why they keep the records, the old idea was that after everything was over, and they had total control, then the histories could be opened and the real information exposed and those who were once vilified would be seen to be heroes, and visa versa]

In early 1989, three top Soviet officials sent Gorbachev a memorandum warning him that the issue was becoming "more acute" and that "time is not our ally." 15 Some form of official admission, even a partial one, would have to be made. At a Kremlin ceremony on 13 October 1990, Gorbachev handed Jaruzelski a folder of documents that left no doubt about Soviet guilt. He did not, however, make a full and complete disclosure. Missing from the folder was the March 1940 NKVD execution order. Gorbachev laid all blame on Stalin's secret police chief, Lavrenty Beria, and his deputy. (This was a safe move, because Beria and his deputy had been branded criminals and summarily shot by Stalin's successors.) Gorbachev also failed to mention that the actual number of victims was 21,857--more than the usually cited figure of 15,000. By shaving the truth, Gorbachev had shielded the Soviet Government and the Communist Party, making Katyn look like a rogue secret police action rather than an official act of mass murder.

Meanwhile Russians can talk about American atrocities. They come no where near the INTENDED and PLANNED actions of the Russians against everyone including their own people.

However with the letter from beria, and more and more information from the actual sites and archives, more and more information came out.

we now know that katyn was just one in an extremely long line of brutal Russian actions outside of all morals. That in the recorded history of man there are few examples of such brutality and malice of forethought, and no example of a nation state totally run that way in perpetuity

The next major discovery turned up in an unexpected place--the National Archives in College Park, Maryland. While conducting research on Katyn at the Archives in spring 1990, a Polish-American art and antiques expert named Waclaw Godziemba-Maliszewski was given a copy of an article entitled "The Katyn Enigma: New Evidence in a 40-Year Riddle" that had appeared in the Spring 1981 issue of Studies in Intelligence. It was written by CIA officer and NPIC analyst Robert G. Poirier, who used imagery from Luftwaffe aerial photoreconnaissance during World War II to uncover evidence of the original crime and a Soviet coverup during 1943-1944. 16 The imagery, selected from 17 sorties flown between 1941 and 1944 and spanning a period before, during, and after the German occupation of the Smolensk area, was important evidence. Among other things, it showed that the area where the mass graves were located had not been altered during the German occupation and that the same area displayed physical changes that predated the Germans' arrival. It also captured the NKVD on film bulldozing some of the Polish graves and removing bodies. Poirier speculated that the corpses had been removed and reburied at another site.

Stalin always operated (as do leftists in the US) as if he would win and that no one was looking so no one would know. (US feminists did the same thing siding with Margret Sanger). Putin is doing the same thing, after all, it works well till later, and later, its too late to bother!

The person above went and located the aerial photos (us Americans don’t trust our CIA, and we are allowed not to, and so we are also allowed access to information. the fact that such information led to lots of sites and many countries confirming it means that the information was not false or contrived). He then re-did the analysis. More and more information came out. MORE than just the mass grave of military people that at the time colored the history (and yoru mind) that it was combatants, or such.

In 1992, Moscow suddenly "discovered" the original 1940 execution ordered signed by Stalin and five other Politburo members-- in Gorbachev's private archive. 17 Gorbachev almost certainly had read it in 1989, if not earlier. 18 In October 1992, Russian President Boris Yeltsin presented a copy of the order along with 41 other documents to the new Polish president, former Solidarity leader Lech Walesa.

And so you can see… more than 50 years of never telling the truth. that the only way to get the truth is not to leave any chance of a lie working.

Russian politics is like dealing with the habitual liar character, except that the character is backed with the deadly force of the state. yeah yeah, that’s the ticket.

Stalin's secret police had committed crimes against some 11,000 Poles living in western Ukraine and western Belorussia after the USSR had incorporated those regions, and murdered more than 3,000 Polish prisoners in panic killings when Germany attacked
in June 1941


Yeltsin told his audience that "totalitarian terror affected not only Polish citizens but, in the first place, the citizens of the former Soviet Union." 22 He added that 10,000 bodies of the "most varied nationalities" had been found there. (The NKVD had used the forest as a killing ground in the 1930s.)


Some Poles undoubtedly took offense at Yeltsin's effort to commemorate Katyn as a common Russian and Polish tragedy and blame it on "totalitarianism." Moreover, the Russian president refused to apologize and did not follow up on his pledge to punish still-living culprits and pay reparations.

So as usual. All lipservice. Smooth out relations but don’t punish the perpetrators as they are HEROES not villains. Lugovoy comes to mind too (and more than 100 other examples I remember from history).

Now its MY turn to teach YOU some history and get SMUG off your face!

It gets REALLY weird, as there was new information showing even more bad about russia, and so they decided to try to turn it all around and make up something (again, figuring that the information to expose them was in the dustbin of time).

the story stood until fall 1998, when Moscow made a bizarre move. In September, Procurator General Yuri Chayka sent a letter to Poland's minister of justice demanding an official inquiry into the deaths of Russian soldiers captured during the Polish-Soviet war of 1919-1921. The letter asserted that 83,500 internees had died "in Polish concentration camps as a result of cruel and inhuman conditions."

Then, in July 1998, the Moscow paper Nezavisimaya Gazeta [Independent Newspaper] ran a front-page article claiming that tens of thousands of prisoners had died as a result of shootings, starvation, and exposure. This article formed the basis of Chayka's demarche. 26 It went beyond previous assertions that Russians and Poles both were victims of Stalinism: "The present position of Warsaw resembles the former position of the USSR, which failed to confess the Katyn crime for a long time . . . . It would be good if Poland followed in Russia's footsteps and pleaded guilty to the savagery [against Red Army soldiers]." The case for moral equivalence had been replaced by a claim to moral superiority.

What a beautiful piece of dissimulation.

Care to go through the line?

First make friends with the poles.
Then betray them with the germans
Then betray the germans by being slow to fulfill their part (as usual)
Then the germans betray the Russians
[secret: The Russians between all this get a hold of lots of poles, and then exterminate them]
They then pawn it off on the germans
The germans pawn it off to them
Years of dissimulation and such till more information is found that exposes russia as the sole operator
Pretend to come to terms and apologize, but never apologize, only claim to share victimhood status
Keep dissimulating, hiding, and denying – keep lying by omission
Let bits out, and when more is to come out, then dissimulate and now the poles and Russians are no longer equal in victimhood, but the poles are bad because they didn’t admit that they did bad too (of which there is no evidence as it was the socialists that had such camps!).

Now at the end, its turned around and russia can pretend to have the superior moral high ground for being a victim of itself!!! kind of like me becoming a saint by shooting myself with arrows.

Right after that game, even MORE information started flooding out about Katyn!!!!

So what it was was a preemptice propaganda practice to cloud the issues and again, actually avoid apology, and other points.

AND here is the proof sir that your assertions as to the Russians and Germans with the Germans being worse is way off base.

in 1998, a Russian-Polish research team issued a series of previously classified secret police reports with the title Eyes Only for J.V. Stalin: NKVD Reports from Poland, 1944-1946. The reports detailed a second wave of terror unleashed during the postwar occupation, showing that the crimes committed during 1939-1941 were not an aberration but part of a single imperial design. Soon thereafter, a group of Polish members of parliament spent 10 days in Russia, trying unsuccessfully to obtain an official acknowledgment that the Soviet Government had engaged in genocide. In the meantime, more graves filled with Polish corpses were found near Tavda and Tomsk, east of the Urals.

That Katyn wasn’t the end, but the beginning, and the games were to hide how big the horrors were and are!!!

You are very wrong sir..

Russians cannot look at Katyn without seeing themselves in the mirror of their own history. Thus official Moscow resists using the "g" word (genocide) to describe the atrocity. When Gorbachev's advisers warned him in 1989 that Poland's demand for the truth contained a "subtext . . . . that the Soviet Union is no better--and perhaps even worse--than Nazi Germany" and that the Soviet Union was "no less responsible" for the outbreak of World War II and the 1939 defeat of the Polish Army, they were also thinking of undercurrents in their own country. 28 Russian intellectuals were already beginning to equate Communism with fascism and Stalin with Hitler. Reports of vandalized war memorials and looted battlefield cemeteries underscored growing popular disillusionment with the cult of triumphalism built around Stalin and the USSR's victory over Nazi Germany. 29 Now some Russian revisionists go so far as to claim that Hitler's invasion launched a preventive war aimed at forestalling Stalin's plan to strike Germany first--a view that even Western historians reject.

The Russians the Russians claimed were killed by poles were killed by Russians. And you can see where and why the information your giving out with smugness is intended to push someone to think HITLER is worse than STALIN.

But there is actually no way to show that! you can EASILY show that stalin was worse than Hitler though… from practices, to volume, to sadistic extremes, experimentation, and never stopping any of it during their whole existence! Their creating the concept of perpetual war gave us perpetual spy orgs!! Just like when a woman strips all other women who want to compete with her have to strip to. It’s a race to the bottom, and it was Lenin that said, we will get to the bottom first! And win. But he said it more eloquently by justifying using the criminally insane sociopaths for state appointments.


Don’t berate people for not knowing history, when you don’t know it either.


Mark Adomanis says:

Artflgr, you really need to stop using opium, or hash, or acid, or whatever crazy psychotropic substance you use before you write a post.
I'm not sure why you saw fit to go to wikipedia and post a cliff-notes version of Katyn. I know Katyn happened, I know Stalin ordered it, I know the Soviets did it, and I know it was brutal. You are lecturing me about what, exactly? Where did I say the Soviets weren't brutal?
Here's what, learn a lesson in conciseness and then get back to me, I don't have the time or the inclination to wade through hundreds of words of your awful writing. Kim/LR/whoever she is may be wrong and malicious, but at least she gets the damn point across.

Oh and Kim, thanks for not deleting my earlier post, that was the first time in weeks! Nice of you not to respond to any of its substance though!


Mark Adomanis says:

Artflgr, you really need to stop using opium, or hash, or acid, or whatever crazy psychotropic substance you use before you write a post.
I'm not sure why you saw fit to go to wikipedia and post a cliff-notes version of Katyn. I know Katyn happened, I know Stalin ordered it, I know the Soviets did it, and I know it was brutal. You are lecturing me about what, exactly? Where did I say the Soviets weren't brutal?
Here's what, learn a lesson in conciseness and then get back to me, I don't have the time or the inclination to wade through hundreds of words of your awful writing. Kim/LR/whoever she is may be wrong and malicious, but at least she gets the damn point across.

Oh and Kim, thanks for not deleting my earlier post, that was the first time in weeks! Nice of you not to respond to any of its substance though!


La Russophobe says:

MARK:

This blog does not permit personal abuse directed at fellow commenters. The next time you engage in this odious practice, your comment will be deleted.

I did not respond to your comment further because it lacked substance or insight and therefore justified none. I find your hypocrisy odious and your intellect callow. If you don't care for the way I run this blog, don't read it, and certainly don't exericise yourself to comment upon it. You will not be missed.

By the way, as the blog has clearly noted, we've had some technical difficulties that may have blocked some comments. This blog has HUNDREDS of comments that criticize me, for you to to suggest I'm somehow afraid of them is dishonesty unworthy of a cockroach.

And please stop double posting. It's idiotic and annoying.


Mark Adomanis says:

Still waiting for you to explain to my "callow intellect" how in God's name the West would ever slap serious sanctions on Russia, given today's extremely high prices for oil and natural gas (since Russia's exports are about 75% energy, that's the only way "sanctions" would actually hurt the country. Of course, we could always put some symbolic and ineffective sanctions on them, but that wouldn't accomplish very much, would it)

I'm also waiting for an explanation for your newfound respect for Human Rights Watch, an organization that has previously criticized the political party you hold dear and a president which you greatly respect.

And should a top-flight blog not consistently break down? What is it with the constant technical problems? I didn't "double post" on purpose, the first time I tried to post I got a technical error message from your sever telling me the post wasn't accepted. Don't blame me because you're on some half-rate system that doesn't function properly


Sarkozy says:

This is ridiculous. A Russian energy company is expanding internationally? Stop the presses and sound the alarm – a precise nuclear strike is the only answer.

There are still pro-Russian minority republics? Miraculous – I would have thought all the Russians there would have died out already due to astonishingly poor living standards and a dramatically high suicide rate. You are correct nonetheless - there’s only one egalitarian response to Moscow’s cunning support of Serbian borders and its sickening backing international law – economic sanctions.

The construction of military installations near Russia’s rotten borders could only mean that the country is aggressive. After all, why would these apparatuses of freedom be assembled otherwise? A sole reporter’s risky move to Ukraine is an incident of gargantuan importance, as Eastern Slavs rarely cross the Russo-Ukrainian border, preferring instead to wallow in their own filth, thinking of ways to undercut Western democratic values.

While the recent fall in Russian stocks may have been caused by the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis (this has been stated rather gloatingly in another article on this site), it has revealed a glaring flaw in Russian economic policy, and coincidentally, a flaw in the rest of the world. I am talking of course about its dependence on America. Shame on you, world – you should have figured out that comparative advantage was an elaborate trick invented by macroeconomists to lull you into a false sense of security.

Finally, we can no longer blame the Russian government. If Russia is a democracy, we must strive to apply Darwin’s theory of evolution to our own calculations – indeed, the Russian people are to blame, if possible, for all wrongs of modern day societies.

Do you smell that children? That is the stench of xenophobia.


Mark says:

“This is where Vladimir Putin has led his nation, to the very brink of utter ruin. Russia is now to be treated by the civilized countries of the world just as if it were Libya, or Iran.”

What planet are you from? Yeah, ok that’s why Russia has close to several trillion dollars in natural resources compared to the US’s several trillion dollars of debt. What a ridiculous article. Its, Obviously wrapped with a NeoCon stench!


Michael says:

I have never imagined it is possible to write such a low taste article full of sick interpretations.


Gringo says:

The argument over which murdering psychopathic dictator, Hitler or Stalin, screwed Poland over more,is a sterile one. They both did.

I knew a woman, born in Estonia in the 1930s, who as a child lived under both German and Soviet occupation.She didn't bother arguing over which was worse. She just thanked her lucky stars that she and her family were able to escape to the West.


Artfldgr says:

Gringo,
As does whats left of my family.

The reason this argument comes up is not that people like me are not willing to look at it that way, but that there are those that wish to measure the two by placing one on top of the other. so that one rises above the issue when one should be hip deep in the same crap.

its a race to the bottom when they do this, since if one leaves such assertions alone, they are accepted as a fact, and then what happens is that suddenly people are thinking that a monster is a hero.

THEN they start to copy them...


Sarkozy says:

Kim, I'm glad you learned from our comments.


elmer says:

Why do we study history?

For the same reason that rooshans falsify it, and don't learn from it.

Thank you, Kim, and thank you, artfldgr.

Why do we study history?

All you have to do is look at the Spectator article from Jeremy about Putin and his FSB bombing apartment buildins in Roosha - and trying to blame it on Chechens.

And all you have to do is look at the quote in the article from Putin, promising to "kill Chechens in the shit-hole."

After all the killing that Stalin did, rooshans still have not learned anything.


elmer says:

Here is yet another example of rooshan distortion of history.

The rooshan philosophy is to distract attention from rooshan atrocities by making false accusations against others.

http://www.unian.net/eng/news/news-234844.html


SBU declassifies documents proving OUN-UPA not connected with anti-Jewish actions


The Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) has declassified documents, proving that OUN [the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists] is not connected with the anti-Jewish action in Lviv in 1941.


According to an UNIAN correspondent, SBU archive representative, candidate of historical sciences Oleksander Ishchuk showed the declassified documents, which provide an objective basis to state that OUN is not connected with violent actions against the civil population of Lviv in July 1941.


In particular, according to O.Ishchuk, the declassified documents of SBU indicate that on July 4-7 of 1941, representatives of Gestapo, who arrived in Lviv, turned to Ukrainian circles with demand to carry out a three-day massacre of Jews. “The OUN leadership, having got to know about that, informed its members that it was a German provocation in order to compromise Ukrainians with massacres”, the document reads.


“The SBU documents confirm that OUN members were trying to avoid taking part in actions against the Jewish population in Lviv, there were no official instructions on this issue”, O.Ishchuk stressed.


At the same time, the historian pointed out that none of the Soviet criminal cases, brought against OUN-UPA members, and kept in the SBU archive, has ever mentioned murdering civil population.


The scientist stressed that thanks to declassifying the documents, now historians have grounds to state that the OUN leadership refused to take part in Jewish massacres in Lviv in 1941.






Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/631