Publius Pundit

« Previous · Home · Next »

Bush Snubs Russia

Filed under: Russia

76-20071012-USRUSSIA-chrono.small.prod_affiliate.91.jpg

President Bush has snubbed Russia by calling "president-elect" Dmitri Medvedev and failing to offer him "congratulations" on his victory at the polls, something normally done by the U.S. president in such cases. North Korea, by contrast, stated: "I convey my sincere congratulations to you."

Lying brazenly to their readers as usual, Russian media claimed congratulations were given (the Moscow Times has a devastating long piece exposing the extent to which Russian journalists have blithely sold out to the neo-Soviet system).

At last, perhaps, George Bush has grasped the extreme gravity of the situation into which he has placed himself, imperiling our security by telling us we could "trust" Vladmir Putin, only to see him abrogate democracy and provoke a new cold war. But failing to say congratulations is far short of the emphatic condemnation of the sham "elections" that have taken place in Russia which Bush should have immediately issued.

Meanwhile, for his part, Vladimir Putin has betrayed his country to an even greater extent, poisoning its relations with all the civilized, developed nations of the globe and leaving it with only rogue states for company.

Click the jump to read the White House Press Secretary's exchange with the press on Bush's call to Medvedev.

May 4, 2008 White House Press Briefing by Dana Perino

Q Dana, I missed the top of the briefing, so forgive me; if you've already addressed this, just stop me. On Russia, what's the message being sent by not congratulating Medvedev? Every statement that's come out of State, out of here, always avoids saying, we congratulate him, the President congratulates him, whatever. What's the purpose of that?

MS. PERINO: I don't know of any purpose, necessarily. I think that what the President did today was call the President-elect of Russia. They had a very good first conversation. You'll recall that they actually met in 2004, had brief conversation there. The President doesn't know him very well, as you heard him say last week. He's established a good relationship with President Putin, in that they've had their difficulties over the years -- I think the President described it as "diplomatic head butts," and I think that's an accurate description. But I also know that at the -- that the President and President Putin have long believed that having a good relationship between our two countries is in our interests on a variety of levels, especially when it comes to counterterrorism, non-proliferation issues. And I would note that Russia yesterday joined the U.N. Security Council in unanimously voting for a third round of sanctions against Iran, to make sure that Iran does not have the capability to produce a nuclear weapon. So there's lots of different ways that we can cooperate with President-elect Medvedev, and we'll look forward to working with him. Obviously, the President will be talking to President Putin between now and May 7th.

Q Dana, to be clear, in this call, he did not do something he routinely does with elected Presidents all over the world, which is say "congratulations"?

MS. PERINO: He did what he routinely does with lots of Presidents-elect around the world, which is call to say thank you for taking my call, and I look forward to working with you. I'm not going to get into the word game about congratulations or not congratulations. Our position about the Russian elections leading up to it have been well-known, and our concerns were expressed from the beginning. At this point, they now have the President-elect. He will be -- he will take office on May 7th. And President Bush believes it is very important that we continue to have good relationship with Russia. It's in both of our countries' interests. We don't believe that Russia, going forward, should have anything to fear about having multi-party elections, more free speech, more access for media, and a free press. There's lots of issues that we've had to work out, and I would just point you to the past comments about these elections, but also that the President is looking forward, and that's why he called him today.

Q Dana, Senator McCain said that the Russian election wouldn't pass the smell test of any functioning democracy. He said that the elections were clearly rigged, the opposition was repressed. So just so I'm clear, the White House position now is still that essentially, let's let the observers make a final determination? Or are you just moving beyond, now, the election, and looking forward to working with him?

MS. PERINO: I respect Senator McCain's views. I'm not going to comment in any way to try to get myself involved in the '08 election. But what I will say is that our position about the run-up to the elections in Russia was well-known. Our concerns were expressed not just from this podium, not just from the State Department, but from President Bush to President Putin himself. But it should be noted the President Bush realizes that what we need to do now is make sure that we establish a good foundation of a relationship that we can have going forward with President-elect Medvedev, who will take office on May 7th.

Social Bookmarking:
Del.icio.us this del.icio.us | digg this digg | Add to Technorati technorati | StumbleUpon Toolbar stumble upon | Furl this furl | Reddit this reddit

Comments


Vova says:

Better late than never. Amazing grace...


Vova says:

The White House hack says "We don't believe that Russia, going forward, should have anything to fear about having multi-party elections, more free speech, more access for media, and a free press." They merely "don't believe" and don't have the guts to say what by now is common knowledge?
We should send Obama to represent the United States at Putvedev's "inauguration." Considering the rooskies' pathological racism this would be the ultimate insult.


La Russophobe says:

The United States, you brainless twit, was one of the first countries to recognize Kosovo as an independent nation, directly flouting Russia's wishes, and it is standing foursquare behind a defensive missile system for Eastern Europe, again infuriating Russia.

Actions speak louder than words, you illiterate moron. You live in a pathetic world of neo-Soviet denial. Can you name ONE ACTION taken recently by the Bush government to promote "good relations" with Russia?

Meanwhile, like the baboon you are, you simply ignore the blatant, humiliating snub referred to in this post. How typical for a neo-Soviet fool.


wait a minute says:

Wow Kim, this is fascinating and important news because, as we all know, George W. Bush is a popular and well-liked US president who enjoys broad international support and has a lot of influence in the international arena!

Oh wait, he's definitely the least popular president in history and likely the worst. Given that everything Bush touches (the economy, Iraq, Iran, social security reform, immigration, etc. etc.) turns to shit, Putin and Medvedev should thank God that Bush is "distancing" himself from them.

In fact, if I were an international leader and Bush WASN'T criticizing me, I would think that something is drastically wrong.


La Russophobe says:

Maybe you should try reading the press a bit more, you dolt.

Don't respect Bush? That's fine. But John McCain has called for Russia to be kicked out of the G-8, Hillary Clinton has said Putin has no soul, and Barack Obama has praised Bill Clinton's attack on Yugoslavia while attacking Bush for being too soft on Russia.

Please, try to think at least a little before you write. That way, maybe you won't embarrass yourself and this blog quite so much next time.


ok... says:

then why devote an entire blog post to the ramblings of a lame-duck moron like bush?


colleen says:

On Russian/American cooperation:

NASA hinted that it might rely on Russian rockets to deliver crew and cargo to the international space station when the shuttle fleet is retired in 2010 if private space companies fail to fill the gap. The space agency would prefer to give American aerospace firms the chance to deliver cargo to the space station but may be forced to buy such services from the Russians if commercial rockets are "not yet demonstrated and available," said NASA Deputy Administrator Shana Dale. "While I do not like the idea that the United States may have no option other than to purchase crew transport services from Russia ... I am glad that the Russians are our partners and have such capabilities," Dale said during NASA's budget briefing Monday.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23009821/


colleen says:

Oh, and from a recent Economist article:

The two countries' civilian space programmes are so closely intertwined, argues Ms Gottemoeller, that if an American space shuttle were to be in serious difficulty in space

http://www.economist.com/world/international/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10696195

Just sayin'.


colleen says:

Yet the two countries' civilian space programmes are so closely intertwined, argues Ms Gottemoeller, that if an American space shuttle were to be in serious difficulty in space, it would likely be a Russian-built rescue craft that brought the crew back to earth.


Vova says:

Colleen, Rose is absolutely right. It's been common knowledge for a long time. We have the shuttle-orbiter, a multiple use vehicle, and the Russians have expendable vehicles. That's how it is, and this proves nothing.


Vova says:

I wonder who's gonna play L. Riefenstahl's role in covering the "inauguration" of the vermins and maggots in the shithole of a cesspit you call Russia. Mikhalkov? Oliver Stone? George Soros?
I pity the U.S. whoever who has to attend this Nurenberg gathering of swine. It won't look good if you have aspirations for higher office. I hope our delegation is headed by a pimp like Jesse Jackson, or at best a dog catcher. Or ugly b-i-t-c-h Gloria Steinem


Vova says:

Puber, I agree albeit with one correction: anti-globalists in reality are anti-American. When the trash riots, they never torch Russian or French companies, always U.S. car dealerships, McDonald's, etc.






Post a comment


(will not be published)



Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)




TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://publiuspundit.com/mt/contages.cgi/685